The NACRE thermonuclear reaction compilation and big bang nucleosynthesis

Richard H. Cyburt, Brian D. Fields, Keith A. Olive

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

136 Scopus citations


The theoretical predictions of big bang nucleosynthesis (BBN) are dominated by uncertainties in the input nuclear reaction cross sections. In this paper we examine the impact on BBN of the recent compilation of nuclear data and thermonuclear reactions rates by the NACRE collaboration. We confirm that the adopted rates do not make large overall changes in central values of predictions, but do affect the magnitude of the uncertainties in these predictions. We therefore examine in detail the uncertainties in the individual reaction rates considered by NACRE. When the error estimates by NACRE are treated as 1σ limits, the resulting BBN error budget is similar to those of previous tabulations. We propose two new procedures for deriving reaction rate uncertainties from the nuclear data: one which sets lower limits to the error, and one which we believe is a reasonable description of the present error budget. We propagate these uncertainty estimates through the BBN code, and find that when the nuclear data errors are described most accurately, the resulting light element uncertainties are notably smaller than in some previous tabulations, but larger than others. Using these results, we derive limits on the cosmic baryon-to-photon ratio η, and compare this to independent limits on η from recent balloon-borne measurements of the cosmic microwave background radiation (CMB). We discuss means to improve the BBN results via key nuclear reaction measurements and light element observations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)215-238
Number of pages24
JournalNew Astronomy
Issue number4
StatePublished - Jun 2001


  • 26.35
  • 98.80.Ft
  • Nuclear reactions, nucleosynthesis, abundances


Dive into the research topics of 'The NACRE thermonuclear reaction compilation and big bang nucleosynthesis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this