The Myth of Closure

Pauline Boss, Donna Carnes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

37 Scopus citations

Abstract

Therapies for grief and loss have traditionally focused on the work of grieving. The goal was to reach an endpoint, now popularly called closure. There are, however, many people who, through no fault of their own, find a loss so unclear that there can be no end to grief. They have not failed in the work of grieving, but rather have suffered ambiguous loss, a type of loss that is inherently open ended. Instead of closure, the therapeutic goal is to help people find meaning despite the lack of definitive information and finality. Hope lies in increasing a family's tolerance for ambiguity, but first, professionals must increase their own comfort with unanswered questions. In this article, the authors, one a poet, the other a family therapist and theorist, offer a unique blending of theory, reflection, and poetry to experientially deepen the process of self-reflection about a kind of loss that defies closure.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)456-469
Number of pages14
JournalFamily process
Volume51
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2012

Keywords

  • Ambiguous Loss
  • Complex Grief
  • Meaning Making
  • No Closure
  • Sadness Versus Depression
  • Self-Reflection
  • Unresolved Grief
  • Unresolved Loss

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The Myth of Closure'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this