TY - JOUR
T1 - The mrfit behavior pattern study
T2 - II. Type a behavior and incidence of coronary heart disease
AU - Shekelle, Richard B.
AU - Hulley, Stephen B.
AU - Neaton, Jim
AU - Billings, James H.
AU - Borhani, Nemat O.
AU - Gerace, Terence A.
AU - Jacobs Jr, David R
AU - Lasser, Norman L.
AU - Mittlemark, Maurice B.
AU - Stamler, Jeremiah
PY - 1985/10
Y1 - 1985/10
N2 - Behavior pattern was assessed by interview for 3,110 men at eight centers in the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial (1973-1976). The Type A pattern was not significantly associated with risk of first major coronary events (coronary death and definite nonfatal myocardial infarction) after a mean follow-up of 7.1 years. Crude relative risks for Types A1-A2 versus X-B were 1.08 in usual care, 0.82 in special intervention, and 0.92 overall. Adjustment for age, blood pressure, cigarette smoking, serum cholesterol, consumption of alcohol, and educational attainment yielded relative risks of 0.99 in usual care, 0.81 in special intervention, and 0.87 overall (95% confidence interval = 0.59-1.28). The Jenkins Activity Survey Type A score, obtained for 12,772 men at all 22 centers, was also not significantly associated with risk of first major coronary events. Overall, crude risks in the lowest (Type B) through highest (Type A) quintiles of the score's distribution were 5.0%, 4.4%, 4.0%, 4.3%, and 4.1%, respectively. The proportional hazards regression coefficient, adjusted for the variables listed above, was -0.006 (95% confidence interval = -0.015-0.003). These results raise questions regarding the robustness of the Type A hypothesis in its present form. Further studies are needed to investigate these questions and to evaluate the validity of procedures used to assess behavior patterns.
AB - Behavior pattern was assessed by interview for 3,110 men at eight centers in the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial (1973-1976). The Type A pattern was not significantly associated with risk of first major coronary events (coronary death and definite nonfatal myocardial infarction) after a mean follow-up of 7.1 years. Crude relative risks for Types A1-A2 versus X-B were 1.08 in usual care, 0.82 in special intervention, and 0.92 overall. Adjustment for age, blood pressure, cigarette smoking, serum cholesterol, consumption of alcohol, and educational attainment yielded relative risks of 0.99 in usual care, 0.81 in special intervention, and 0.87 overall (95% confidence interval = 0.59-1.28). The Jenkins Activity Survey Type A score, obtained for 12,772 men at all 22 centers, was also not significantly associated with risk of first major coronary events. Overall, crude risks in the lowest (Type B) through highest (Type A) quintiles of the score's distribution were 5.0%, 4.4%, 4.0%, 4.3%, and 4.1%, respectively. The proportional hazards regression coefficient, adjusted for the variables listed above, was -0.006 (95% confidence interval = -0.015-0.003). These results raise questions regarding the robustness of the Type A hypothesis in its present form. Further studies are needed to investigate these questions and to evaluate the validity of procedures used to assess behavior patterns.
KW - Coronary disease
KW - Psychological tests
KW - Psychology
KW - Stress
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0021809188&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0021809188&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114135
DO - 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114135
M3 - Article
C2 - 4025299
AN - SCOPUS:0021809188
SN - 0002-9262
VL - 122
SP - 559
EP - 570
JO - American journal of epidemiology
JF - American journal of epidemiology
IS - 4
ER -