The meaning of 'Most': Semantics, numerosity and psychology

Paul Pietroski, Jeffrey Lidz, Tim Hunter, Justin Halberda

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

58 Scopus citations

Abstract

The meaning of 'most' can be described in many ways. We offer a framework for distinguishing semantic descriptions, interpreted as psychological hypotheses that go beyond claims about sentential truth conditions, and an experiment that tells against an attractive idea: 'most' is understood in terms of one-to-one correspondence. Adults evaluated 'Most of the dots are yellow', as true or false, on many trials in which yellow dots and blue dots were displayed for 200 ms. Displays manipulated the ease of using a 'one-to-one with remainder' strategy, and a strategy of using the Approximate Number System to compare of (approximations of) cardinalities. Interpreting such data requires care in thinking about how meaning is related to verification. But the results suggest that 'most' is understood in terms of cardinality comparison, even when counting is impossible.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)554-585
Number of pages32
JournalMind and Language
Volume24
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2009

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The meaning of 'Most': Semantics, numerosity and psychology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this