Abstract
Counseling psychologists often work with clients to increase their well-being as well as to decrease their distress. One important aspect of well-being, highlighted particularly in humanistic theories of the counseling process, is perceived meaning in life. However, poor measurement has hampered research on meaning in life. In 3 studies, evidence is provided for the internal consistency, temporal stability, factor structure, and validity of the Meaning in Life Questionnaire (MLQ), a new 10-item measure of the presence of, and the search for, meaning in life. A multitrait-multimethod matrix demonstrates the convergent and discriminant validity of the MLQ subscales across time and informants, in comparison with 2 other meaning scales. The MLQ offers several improvements over current meaning in life measures, including no item overlap with distress measures, a stable factor structure, better discriminant validity, a briefer format, and the ability to measure the search for meaning.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 80-93 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| Journal | Journal of counseling psychology |
| Volume | 53 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jan 2006 |
Keywords
- Meaning in life
- Measurement
- Purpose in life
- Scale construction
- Well-being
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The meaning in life questionnaire: Assessing the presence of and search for meaning in life'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS