The local abundance of3He: A confrontation between theory and observation

Sean T. Scully, Michel Cassé, Keith A. Olive, David N. Schramm, James Truran, Elisabeth Vangioni-Flam

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

30 Scopus citations

Abstract

Determinations of the 3He concentrations in Galactic matter serve to impose interesting and important constraints both on cosmological models and on models of Galactic chemical evolution. At present, observations of 3He in the solar system and in the interstellar medium today suggest that the 3He abundance has not increased significantly over the history of the Galaxy, while theoretical models of Galactic chemical evolution (utilizing current nucleosynthesis yields from stellar evolution and supernova models) predict a rather substantial increase in 3He. We consider the possibility that the solar 3He abundance may have been affected by stellar processing in the solar neighborhood prior to the formation of the solar system. Such a discrepancy between solar abundances and average Galactic abundances by as much as a factor of 2 may be evidenced by several isotopic anomalies. Local destruction of 3He by a similar amount could serve to help reconcile the expected increase in the 3He abundance predicted by models of Galactic chemical evolution. We find, however, that the production of heavier elements, such as oxygen, places a strong constraint on the degree of 3He destruction. We also explore the implications of both alternative models of Galactic chemical evolution and the stellar yields for 3He in low-mass stars, which can explain the history of the 3He concentration in the Galaxy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)960-968
Number of pages9
JournalAstrophysical Journal
Volume462
Issue number2 PART I
DOIs
StatePublished - 1996

Keywords

  • Galaxy: abundances
  • Galaxy: evolution
  • Nuclear reactions, nucleosynthesis, abundances
  • Sun: abundances

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The local abundance of<sup>3</sup>He: A confrontation between theory and observation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this