Abstract
Prior to the mid-1980s, labor productivity growth was a useful barometer of the U.S. economys performance:it was low during economic recessions and high during expansions. Since then, labor productivityhas become significantly less procyclical. In the recent recession of 20082009, labor productivity actuallyrose as GDP plummeted. These facts have motivated the development of new business cycle theoriesbecause the conventional view is that they are inconsistent with existing business cycle theory. In thispaper, we analyze recent events with existing theory and find that the labor productivity puzzle is muchless of a puzzle than previously thought. In light of these findings, we argue that policy agendas arisingfrom new untested theories should be disregarded.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 44-87 |
| Number of pages | 44 |
| Journal | Federal Reserve Bank Working Papers |
| State | Published - 2012 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The Labor Productivity Puzzle'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS