The Job Market for Justice: Screening and Selecting Candidates for the International Court of Justice

Cosette D Creamer, Zuzanna Godzimirska

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Over the past few decades, states have granted greater independence and authority to international courts, yet still retain their ability to control who sits on the bench. This article examines how governments use their power of judicial nomination and appointment in the context of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) and assesses the relative influence of three factors on states' vote choices for ICJ candidates: The candidates' probability of (in)sensitivity to political considerations; their qualifications; and the role of interstate politics. Drawing on a new dataset of candidates nominated for election to the ICJ between 1949 and 2010, we demonstrate that electing states base their initial vote choices largely on the same set of factors within both bodies that elect ICJ judges: The United Nations General Assembly and Security Council. In particular, professional experiences signaling a probability of insensitivity to political considerations reduce a candidate's expected vote share. A candidate's qualifications, on the other hand, do not appear to make a considerable difference in winning more votes. Finally, the amount of support during the nomination stage is highly correlated with vote share, suggesting that considerable screening occurs prior to nomination and that the number of nominations received facilitates co-ordination of vote choice across states.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)947-966
Number of pages20
JournalLeiden Journal of International Law
Volume30
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2017

Fingerprint

International Court of Justice
voter
candidacy
justice
market
qualification
professional experience
UNO
election
politics
ability

Keywords

  • International Court of Justice
  • elections
  • independence
  • international courts

Cite this

The Job Market for Justice : Screening and Selecting Candidates for the International Court of Justice. / Creamer, Cosette D; Godzimirska, Zuzanna.

In: Leiden Journal of International Law, Vol. 30, No. 4, 01.12.2017, p. 947-966.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{bf8bcedf6bbc4b328e683cac0efd4791,
title = "The Job Market for Justice: Screening and Selecting Candidates for the International Court of Justice",
abstract = "Over the past few decades, states have granted greater independence and authority to international courts, yet still retain their ability to control who sits on the bench. This article examines how governments use their power of judicial nomination and appointment in the context of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) and assesses the relative influence of three factors on states' vote choices for ICJ candidates: The candidates' probability of (in)sensitivity to political considerations; their qualifications; and the role of interstate politics. Drawing on a new dataset of candidates nominated for election to the ICJ between 1949 and 2010, we demonstrate that electing states base their initial vote choices largely on the same set of factors within both bodies that elect ICJ judges: The United Nations General Assembly and Security Council. In particular, professional experiences signaling a probability of insensitivity to political considerations reduce a candidate's expected vote share. A candidate's qualifications, on the other hand, do not appear to make a considerable difference in winning more votes. Finally, the amount of support during the nomination stage is highly correlated with vote share, suggesting that considerable screening occurs prior to nomination and that the number of nominations received facilitates co-ordination of vote choice across states.",
keywords = "International Court of Justice, elections, independence, international courts",
author = "Creamer, {Cosette D} and Zuzanna Godzimirska",
year = "2017",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/S0922156517000437",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "947--966",
journal = "Leiden Journal of International Law",
issn = "0922-1565",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Job Market for Justice

T2 - Screening and Selecting Candidates for the International Court of Justice

AU - Creamer, Cosette D

AU - Godzimirska, Zuzanna

PY - 2017/12/1

Y1 - 2017/12/1

N2 - Over the past few decades, states have granted greater independence and authority to international courts, yet still retain their ability to control who sits on the bench. This article examines how governments use their power of judicial nomination and appointment in the context of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) and assesses the relative influence of three factors on states' vote choices for ICJ candidates: The candidates' probability of (in)sensitivity to political considerations; their qualifications; and the role of interstate politics. Drawing on a new dataset of candidates nominated for election to the ICJ between 1949 and 2010, we demonstrate that electing states base their initial vote choices largely on the same set of factors within both bodies that elect ICJ judges: The United Nations General Assembly and Security Council. In particular, professional experiences signaling a probability of insensitivity to political considerations reduce a candidate's expected vote share. A candidate's qualifications, on the other hand, do not appear to make a considerable difference in winning more votes. Finally, the amount of support during the nomination stage is highly correlated with vote share, suggesting that considerable screening occurs prior to nomination and that the number of nominations received facilitates co-ordination of vote choice across states.

AB - Over the past few decades, states have granted greater independence and authority to international courts, yet still retain their ability to control who sits on the bench. This article examines how governments use their power of judicial nomination and appointment in the context of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) and assesses the relative influence of three factors on states' vote choices for ICJ candidates: The candidates' probability of (in)sensitivity to political considerations; their qualifications; and the role of interstate politics. Drawing on a new dataset of candidates nominated for election to the ICJ between 1949 and 2010, we demonstrate that electing states base their initial vote choices largely on the same set of factors within both bodies that elect ICJ judges: The United Nations General Assembly and Security Council. In particular, professional experiences signaling a probability of insensitivity to political considerations reduce a candidate's expected vote share. A candidate's qualifications, on the other hand, do not appear to make a considerable difference in winning more votes. Finally, the amount of support during the nomination stage is highly correlated with vote share, suggesting that considerable screening occurs prior to nomination and that the number of nominations received facilitates co-ordination of vote choice across states.

KW - International Court of Justice

KW - elections

KW - independence

KW - international courts

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85041215833&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85041215833&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0922156517000437

DO - 10.1017/S0922156517000437

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85041215833

VL - 30

SP - 947

EP - 966

JO - Leiden Journal of International Law

JF - Leiden Journal of International Law

SN - 0922-1565

IS - 4

ER -