TY - JOUR
T1 - The iterative reprocessing model
T2 - A multilevel framework for attitudes and evaluation
AU - Cunningham, William A.
AU - Zelazo, Philip David
AU - Packer, Dominic J.
AU - Van Bavel, Jay J.
PY - 2007/10
Y1 - 2007/10
N2 - Dual-process models of attitudes highlight the fact that evaluative processes are complex and multifaceted. Nevertheless, many of these models typically neglect important interactions among processes that can contribute to an evaluation. In this article, we propose a multilevel model informed by neuroscience in which current evaluations are constructed from relatively stable attitude representations through the iterative reprocessing of information. Whereas initial iterations provide relatively quick and dirty evaluations, additional iterations accompanied by reflective processes yield more nuanced evaluations and allow for phenomena such as ambivalence. Importantly, this model predicts that the processes underlying relatively automatic evaluations continue to be engaged across multiple iterations, and that they influence and are influenced by more reflective processes. We describe the Iterative Reprocessing Model at the computational, algorithmic, and implementational levels of analysis (Marr, 1982) to more fully characterize its premises and predictions.
AB - Dual-process models of attitudes highlight the fact that evaluative processes are complex and multifaceted. Nevertheless, many of these models typically neglect important interactions among processes that can contribute to an evaluation. In this article, we propose a multilevel model informed by neuroscience in which current evaluations are constructed from relatively stable attitude representations through the iterative reprocessing of information. Whereas initial iterations provide relatively quick and dirty evaluations, additional iterations accompanied by reflective processes yield more nuanced evaluations and allow for phenomena such as ambivalence. Importantly, this model predicts that the processes underlying relatively automatic evaluations continue to be engaged across multiple iterations, and that they influence and are influenced by more reflective processes. We describe the Iterative Reprocessing Model at the computational, algorithmic, and implementational levels of analysis (Marr, 1982) to more fully characterize its premises and predictions.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=36148954264&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=36148954264&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1521/soco.2007.25.5.736
DO - 10.1521/soco.2007.25.5.736
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:36148954264
SN - 0278-016X
VL - 25
SP - 736
EP - 760
JO - Social Cognition
JF - Social Cognition
IS - 5
ER -