Abstract
A deep-ingrained doctrine in asset pricing says that if an empirical characteristic-return relation is consistent with investor "rationality," the relation must be "explained" by a risk (factor) model. The investment approach questions the doctrine. Factors formed on characteristics are not necessarily risk factors; characteristics-based factor models are linear approximations of firm-level investment returns. The evidence that characteristics dominate covariances in horse races does not necessarily mean mispricing; measurement errors in covariances are likely to blame. Most important, risks do not "determine" expected returns; the investment approach is no more and no less "causal" than the consumption approach in "explaining" anomalies.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 351-366 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| Journal | Journal of Monetary Economics |
| Volume | 60 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Apr 1 2013 |
| Externally published | Yes |