The intersection of scale, science, and law in Massachusetts v. EPA: State, National, and International Approaches

Hari M. Osofsky

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

INTRODUCTION Justice Scalia: But I always thought an air pollutant was something different from a stratospheric pollutant, and your claim here is not that the pollution of what we normally call “air” is endangering health.…[Y]our assertion is that after the pollution leaves the air and goes up into the stratosphere it is contributing to global warming. Mr. Milkey: Respectfully, Your Honor, it is not the stratosphere. It's the troposphere. Justice Scalia: Troposphere, whatever. I told you before I'm not a scientist. (Laughter). Justice Scalia: That's why I don't want to deal with global warming, to tell you the truth. The above exchange occurred between Justice Scalia and James Milkey, Assistant Attorney General of Massachusetts, during the oral argument in Massachusetts v. EPA, the first case heard by the U.S. Supreme Court on governmental regulation of greenhouse gas emissions. It not only illustrates the complexities of judicial engagement with the science of global warming but also provides a window into one of the greatest obstacles to effective regulatory approaches to the problem of climate change, which the Obama administration must grapple with as it embarks upon its ambitious climate and energy initiatives. Namely, greenhouse gas emissions and their impacts are foundationally multiscalar; they range from the most individual to global levels. Referencing climate change as a multiscalar problem, however, only serves as a starting point for further discussion. “Scale” is a complex and contested concept in both the geography and the ecology literatures.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationAdjudicating Climate Change: State, National, and International Approaches
Subtitle of host publicationState, National, and International Approaches
EditorsWilliam C. G. Burns, Hari M. Osofsky
PublisherCambridge University Press
Pages129-144
Number of pages16
ISBN (Electronic)9780511596766
ISBN (Print)9780521879705
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2009

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The intersection of scale, science, and law in Massachusetts v. EPA: State, National, and International Approaches'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Osofsky, H. M. (2009). The intersection of scale, science, and law in Massachusetts v. EPA: State, National, and International Approaches. In W. C. G. Burns, & H. M. Osofsky (Eds.), Adjudicating Climate Change: State, National, and International Approaches: State, National, and International Approaches (pp. 129-144). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511596766.008