Abstract
Two studies examined the interactive effects of social dominance orientation (SDO), group status, and perceived stability on various manifestations of favoritism for high-status groups: (1) an analysis of survey data from a sample of UCLA students, and (2) an analogous experimental study using a modified version of the minimal-group paradigm. Results of these studies offered general support for the hypothesis that high-SDO members of low-status groups would only favor high-status groups when the system of hierarchy was perceived to be stable (i.e. impervious to change), although findings were somewhat less clear-cut in the experimental study. Implications for social dominance theory and other theories of intergroup behavior are discussed.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 119-143 |
| Number of pages | 25 |
| Journal | Group Processes and Intergroup Relations |
| Volume | 2 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1999 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- False consciousness
- Group status
- Minimal groups
- Social dominance orientation
- Stability
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The interactive effects of social dominance orientation, group status, and perceived stability on favoritism for high-status groups'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS