TY - JOUR
T1 - The influence of triage systems and triage scores on timeliness of ED analgesic administration
AU - Ducharme, James
AU - Tanabe, Paula
AU - Homel, Peter
AU - Miner, James R.
AU - Chang, Andrew K.
AU - Lee, Jacques
AU - Todd, Knox H.
N1 - Funding Information:
The Pain and Emergency Medicine Initiative was supported by a generous grant from the Mayday Fund, New York, NY.
Copyright:
Copyright 2009 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2008/10
Y1 - 2008/10
N2 - Objectives: The aim of the study was to examine the association between triage scoring systems and triage priority scores on time to initial emergency department (ED) analgesic administration. Methods: An observational, multicenter, prospective, cohort study was conducted at 20 US and Canadian EDs. Centers from the United States used the Emergency Severity Index triage system or 1 of 3 unvalidated triage systems. Canadian centers used the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale. Patients aged 8 years or older who presented to the ED with a chief complaint of moderate to severe pain (>3 on a 10-point numerical rating scale) and who were ultimately discharged home were eligible for study enrollment. Triage score, triage system, pain rating on arrival, and time of initial analgesic administration were recorded. Results: Among 842 enrolled subjects, 506 (60%) received an analgesic while in the ED. Lower-acuity patients consistently waited longer for analgesics. On multivariate modeling, presenting pain intensity, total time spent in the ED, white ethnicity, and triage system were associated with time to initial analgesic administration. Emergency departments using the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale triage system exhibited the lowest rates of analgesic use and displayed longer median times to initial analgesic administration. Conclusions: Although there were some differences between triage systems, all sites and systems demonstrated unacceptably long times to analgesic provision. Many patients with moderate to severe pain received no analgesic during their ED stay. Future studies should examine whether ED overcrowding impacts timeliness of analgesic administration and identify specific strategies to improve pain management practices in this challenging environment.
AB - Objectives: The aim of the study was to examine the association between triage scoring systems and triage priority scores on time to initial emergency department (ED) analgesic administration. Methods: An observational, multicenter, prospective, cohort study was conducted at 20 US and Canadian EDs. Centers from the United States used the Emergency Severity Index triage system or 1 of 3 unvalidated triage systems. Canadian centers used the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale. Patients aged 8 years or older who presented to the ED with a chief complaint of moderate to severe pain (>3 on a 10-point numerical rating scale) and who were ultimately discharged home were eligible for study enrollment. Triage score, triage system, pain rating on arrival, and time of initial analgesic administration were recorded. Results: Among 842 enrolled subjects, 506 (60%) received an analgesic while in the ED. Lower-acuity patients consistently waited longer for analgesics. On multivariate modeling, presenting pain intensity, total time spent in the ED, white ethnicity, and triage system were associated with time to initial analgesic administration. Emergency departments using the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale triage system exhibited the lowest rates of analgesic use and displayed longer median times to initial analgesic administration. Conclusions: Although there were some differences between triage systems, all sites and systems demonstrated unacceptably long times to analgesic provision. Many patients with moderate to severe pain received no analgesic during their ED stay. Future studies should examine whether ED overcrowding impacts timeliness of analgesic administration and identify specific strategies to improve pain management practices in this challenging environment.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=53149145097&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=53149145097&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ajem.2007.11.020
DO - 10.1016/j.ajem.2007.11.020
M3 - Article
C2 - 18926342
AN - SCOPUS:53149145097
SN - 0735-6757
VL - 26
SP - 867
EP - 873
JO - American Journal of Emergency Medicine
JF - American Journal of Emergency Medicine
IS - 8
ER -