The influence of oral arguments on the U.S. Supreme court

Timothy R. Johnson, Paul J. Wahlbeck, James F. Spriggs

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

102 Scopus citations

Abstract

We posit that Supreme Court oral arguments provide justices with useful information that influences their final votes on the merits. To examine the role of these proceedings, we ask the following questions: (1) what factors influence the quality of arguments presented to the Court; and, more importantly, (2) does the quality of a lawyer's oral argument affect the justices' final votes on the merits? We answer these questions by utilizing a unique data source - evaluations Justice Blackmun made of the quality of oral arguments presented to the justices. Our analysis shows that Justice Blackmun's grading of attorneys is somewhat influenced by conventional indicators of the credibility of attorneys and are not simply the product of Justice Blackmun's ideological leanings. We thus suggest they can plausibly be seen as measuring the quality of oral argument. We further show that the probability of a justice voting for a litigant increases dramatically if that litigant's lawyer presents better oral arguments than the competing counsel. These results therefore indicate that this element of the Court's decisional process affects final votes on the merits, and it has implications for how other elite decision makers evaluate and use information.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)99-113
Number of pages15
JournalAmerican Political Science Review
Volume100
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2006

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The influence of oral arguments on the U.S. Supreme court'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this