The influence of ecological factors on detecting drumming ruffed grouse

Guthrie S. Zimmerman, R. J. Gutiérrez

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

22 Scopus citations


We surveyed drumming ruffed grouse (Bonasa umbellus) to estimate the probability of detecting an individual, and we used Bayesian model selection to assess the influence of factors that may affect detection probabilities of drumming grouse. We found the average probability of detecting a drumming ruffed grouse during a daily survey was 0.33. The probability of detecting a grouse was most strongly influenced by the temperature change during a survey (βtemp change = 0.23, 95% probability interval [PI] = 0.13 ≤ β ≤ 0.33) and its interaction with temperature at the start of the survey (βinteraction = 0.01, 95% PI = 1.42 × 10 -3 ≤ β ≤ 0.03). Although the best model also included a main effect of temperature at the start of surveys, this variable did not strongly correlate with detection probabilities (βstart temp = -0.03, 95% PI = -0.06 ≤ β ≤ 9.80 × 10-5). Model assessment using data collected at other sites indicated that this best model performed adequately (i.e., positive correlation between observed and predicted values) but did not explain much of the variation in detection rates. Our results are useful for understanding the historical drumming index used to assess ruffed grouse populations and for designing auditory surveys for this important game bird.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1765-1772
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Wildlife Management
Issue number6
StatePublished - Aug 2007


  • Bayesian model
  • Bonasa umbellus
  • Detection rates
  • Drumming surveys
  • Habitat
  • Minnesota
  • Ruffed grouse
  • Weather


Dive into the research topics of 'The influence of ecological factors on detecting drumming ruffed grouse'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this