TY - JOUR
T1 - The individuality and connectedness Q-sort
T2 - A measure for assessing individuality and connectedness in dyadic relationships
AU - Bengtson, Phyllis L.
AU - Grotevant, Harold D
PY - 1999/6
Y1 - 1999/6
N2 - A Q-sort, based on Grotevant and Cooper's (1986) model of individuation, was developed to assess individuality and connectedness in dyadic relationships. A criterion sort for each construct was developed on the basis of ratings from eight experts. The mean intercorrelation among the eight raters was .85 for individuality and .89 for connectedness. This Q-sort was then used to rate 46 middle-class Caucasian parents who were previously assessed on similar constructs using a micro-coding method, the Family Discourse Code (Condon, Cooper, & Grotevant, 1984). Correlations between similar constructs were significant. This Q-sort has five improvements over the Family Discourse Code: Behaviors representing the absence as well as the presence of a construct are coded; salience as well as frequency of behavior determines item placement; coders do not require knowledge of the theoretical underpinnings of items; there is less chance of response bias; and it provides a means of standardizing the assessment of individuality and connectedness across samples.
AB - A Q-sort, based on Grotevant and Cooper's (1986) model of individuation, was developed to assess individuality and connectedness in dyadic relationships. A criterion sort for each construct was developed on the basis of ratings from eight experts. The mean intercorrelation among the eight raters was .85 for individuality and .89 for connectedness. This Q-sort was then used to rate 46 middle-class Caucasian parents who were previously assessed on similar constructs using a micro-coding method, the Family Discourse Code (Condon, Cooper, & Grotevant, 1984). Correlations between similar constructs were significant. This Q-sort has five improvements over the Family Discourse Code: Behaviors representing the absence as well as the presence of a construct are coded; salience as well as frequency of behavior determines item placement; coders do not require knowledge of the theoretical underpinnings of items; there is less chance of response bias; and it provides a means of standardizing the assessment of individuality and connectedness across samples.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=22644450873&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=22644450873&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/j.1475-6811.1999.tb00188.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1475-6811.1999.tb00188.x
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:22644450873
SN - 1350-4126
VL - 6
SP - 213
EP - 225
JO - Personal Relationships
JF - Personal Relationships
IS - 2
ER -