The impudence of being earnest: Jon stewart and the boundaries of discursive responsibility

Matt Carlson, Jason T. Peifer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In late 2010, Jon Stewart attracted considerable news media attention by organizing the Rally to Restore Sanity and/or Fear and, later, pressuring lawmakers to pass legislation providing health care to 9/11 responders. The events renewed an interpretive struggle surrounding Stewart in which journalists understood his activity as signaling a shift in his cultural role. Using the concept of boundary maintenance to qualitatively analyze journalists' interpretations, this study connects journalistic discourse surrounding Stewart to questions of epistemic authority, the role of earnestness in public discourse, and the responsibility of discursive agents. These evaluations of Stewart illuminate the contestation of appropriate norms and practices within the mediated public sphere during an era of complex cultural, economic, and technological change.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)333-350
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Communication
Volume63
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2013

Fingerprint

Health care
journalist
responsibility
Economics
discourse
cultural change
technological change
economic change
news
legislation
health care
anxiety
interpretation
event
evaluation
Responsibility
Journalists
Discursive
Contestation
Healthcare

Cite this

The impudence of being earnest : Jon stewart and the boundaries of discursive responsibility. / Carlson, Matt; Peifer, Jason T.

In: Journal of Communication, Vol. 63, No. 2, 01.04.2013, p. 333-350.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b79ae620d28b4b4290b4ff5b2f8f49a5,
title = "The impudence of being earnest: Jon stewart and the boundaries of discursive responsibility",
abstract = "In late 2010, Jon Stewart attracted considerable news media attention by organizing the Rally to Restore Sanity and/or Fear and, later, pressuring lawmakers to pass legislation providing health care to 9/11 responders. The events renewed an interpretive struggle surrounding Stewart in which journalists understood his activity as signaling a shift in his cultural role. Using the concept of boundary maintenance to qualitatively analyze journalists' interpretations, this study connects journalistic discourse surrounding Stewart to questions of epistemic authority, the role of earnestness in public discourse, and the responsibility of discursive agents. These evaluations of Stewart illuminate the contestation of appropriate norms and practices within the mediated public sphere during an era of complex cultural, economic, and technological change.",
author = "Matt Carlson and Peifer, {Jason T.}",
year = "2013",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/jcom.12019",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "63",
pages = "333--350",
journal = "Journal of Communication",
issn = "0021-9916",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The impudence of being earnest

T2 - Jon stewart and the boundaries of discursive responsibility

AU - Carlson, Matt

AU - Peifer, Jason T.

PY - 2013/4/1

Y1 - 2013/4/1

N2 - In late 2010, Jon Stewart attracted considerable news media attention by organizing the Rally to Restore Sanity and/or Fear and, later, pressuring lawmakers to pass legislation providing health care to 9/11 responders. The events renewed an interpretive struggle surrounding Stewart in which journalists understood his activity as signaling a shift in his cultural role. Using the concept of boundary maintenance to qualitatively analyze journalists' interpretations, this study connects journalistic discourse surrounding Stewart to questions of epistemic authority, the role of earnestness in public discourse, and the responsibility of discursive agents. These evaluations of Stewart illuminate the contestation of appropriate norms and practices within the mediated public sphere during an era of complex cultural, economic, and technological change.

AB - In late 2010, Jon Stewart attracted considerable news media attention by organizing the Rally to Restore Sanity and/or Fear and, later, pressuring lawmakers to pass legislation providing health care to 9/11 responders. The events renewed an interpretive struggle surrounding Stewart in which journalists understood his activity as signaling a shift in his cultural role. Using the concept of boundary maintenance to qualitatively analyze journalists' interpretations, this study connects journalistic discourse surrounding Stewart to questions of epistemic authority, the role of earnestness in public discourse, and the responsibility of discursive agents. These evaluations of Stewart illuminate the contestation of appropriate norms and practices within the mediated public sphere during an era of complex cultural, economic, and technological change.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84875786698&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84875786698&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/jcom.12019

DO - 10.1111/jcom.12019

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84875786698

VL - 63

SP - 333

EP - 350

JO - Journal of Communication

JF - Journal of Communication

SN - 0021-9916

IS - 2

ER -