TY - JOUR
T1 - The Impact of Item Wording and Behavioral Specificity on the Accuracy of Direct Behavior Ratings (DBRs)
AU - Riley-Tillman, T. Chris
AU - Chafouleas, Sandra M.
AU - Christ, Theodore
AU - Briesch, Amy M.
AU - LeBel, Teresa J.
PY - 2009/3/1
Y1 - 2009/3/1
N2 - Direct behavior ratings (DBRs) combine aspects of both systematic direct observation and behavior rating scales to create a feasible method for social behavior assessment within a problem-solving model. The purpose of the current study was to examine whether accuracy of DBRs was affected depending on the behaviors selected to be rated using a DBR. Specifically, the impact target behavior wording (positive vs. negative) and degree of specificity by which the behaviors were defined were investigated. Participants (N = 145), assigned to 1 of 4 experimental conditions, were asked to view video clips of a classroom setting and rate target student behavior. Results indicated that the wording and specificity of behavior included on a DBR may influence the accuracy of ratings. The most accurate ratings of academically engaged behavior occurred when the behavior was defined with a global definition and positive wording. In contrast, the most accurate ratings of disruptive behavior were obtained with a global definition and either positive or negative wording. Limitations, implications, and future directions are discussed.
AB - Direct behavior ratings (DBRs) combine aspects of both systematic direct observation and behavior rating scales to create a feasible method for social behavior assessment within a problem-solving model. The purpose of the current study was to examine whether accuracy of DBRs was affected depending on the behaviors selected to be rated using a DBR. Specifically, the impact target behavior wording (positive vs. negative) and degree of specificity by which the behaviors were defined were investigated. Participants (N = 145), assigned to 1 of 4 experimental conditions, were asked to view video clips of a classroom setting and rate target student behavior. Results indicated that the wording and specificity of behavior included on a DBR may influence the accuracy of ratings. The most accurate ratings of academically engaged behavior occurred when the behavior was defined with a global definition and positive wording. In contrast, the most accurate ratings of disruptive behavior were obtained with a global definition and either positive or negative wording. Limitations, implications, and future directions are discussed.
KW - behavioral assessment
KW - direct behavior ratings (DBRs)
KW - formative assessment
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67749114397&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=67749114397&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1037/a0015248
DO - 10.1037/a0015248
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:67749114397
SN - 1045-3830
VL - 24
SP - 1
EP - 12
JO - School Psychology Quarterly
JF - School Psychology Quarterly
IS - 1
ER -