TY - JOUR
T1 - The history of marriage and the myth of Friedelehe
AU - Karras, Ruth Mazo
PY - 2006/5
Y1 - 2006/5
N2 - The idea that Friedelehe and Muntehe constituted two distinct forms of Germanic marriage was based upon an attempt to reconstruct common Germanic culture with scraps of evidence from widely different times and places. A thorough re-examination of the sources for the institutions that were posited, based on this now outmoded methodology, reveals no evidence that transfer of Munt, or guardianship, distinguished between two different types of marriage, except perhaps in Lombard Italy, under the influence of Roman law. The idea that marriage with a dos is a different institution from marriage without one is not attested until the Carolingian period.
AB - The idea that Friedelehe and Muntehe constituted two distinct forms of Germanic marriage was based upon an attempt to reconstruct common Germanic culture with scraps of evidence from widely different times and places. A thorough re-examination of the sources for the institutions that were posited, based on this now outmoded methodology, reveals no evidence that transfer of Munt, or guardianship, distinguished between two different types of marriage, except perhaps in Lombard Italy, under the influence of Roman law. The idea that marriage with a dos is a different institution from marriage without one is not attested until the Carolingian period.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33748494910&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33748494910&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/j.1468-0254.2006.00177.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1468-0254.2006.00177.x
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:33748494910
SN - 0963-9462
VL - 14
SP - 119
EP - 151
JO - Early Medieval Europe
JF - Early Medieval Europe
IS - 2
ER -