The future of parole release

Edward E. Rhine, Joan Petersilia, Kevin R Reitz

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

American parole boards have played a critical role in the formulation and administration of states' prison policies in recent decades- and could play an equally important part in helping end mass incarceration. Long neglected by academic, research, and policy communities, systems of discretionary prison release are in need of improvement, if not "reinvention." A plan for revitalization of parole release should lay out a comprehensive and aspirational model for the future. It must address the institutional structure of parole boards, how much release discretion they are given, the substantive grounds for release decisions, the use of risk assessments in the decisional process, decisionmaking tools such as parole release guidelines, the requirements of fair and reliable procedures, victims' rights at parole hearings, the need for parole supervision in some but not all cases, the intensity of parole conditions, and the length of parole supervision.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)279-338
Number of pages60
JournalCrime and Justice
Volume46
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

correctional institution
supervision
risk assessment
community

Cite this

The future of parole release. / Rhine, Edward E.; Petersilia, Joan; Reitz, Kevin R.

In: Crime and Justice, Vol. 46, No. 1, 01.01.2017, p. 279-338.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Rhine, EE, Petersilia, J & Reitz, KR 2017, 'The future of parole release', Crime and Justice, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 279-338. https://doi.org/10.1086/688616
Rhine, Edward E. ; Petersilia, Joan ; Reitz, Kevin R. / The future of parole release. In: Crime and Justice. 2017 ; Vol. 46, No. 1. pp. 279-338.
@article{07c2ca37e38645b3a241e34139eb03be,
title = "The future of parole release",
abstract = "American parole boards have played a critical role in the formulation and administration of states' prison policies in recent decades- and could play an equally important part in helping end mass incarceration. Long neglected by academic, research, and policy communities, systems of discretionary prison release are in need of improvement, if not {"}reinvention.{"} A plan for revitalization of parole release should lay out a comprehensive and aspirational model for the future. It must address the institutional structure of parole boards, how much release discretion they are given, the substantive grounds for release decisions, the use of risk assessments in the decisional process, decisionmaking tools such as parole release guidelines, the requirements of fair and reliable procedures, victims' rights at parole hearings, the need for parole supervision in some but not all cases, the intensity of parole conditions, and the length of parole supervision.",
author = "Rhine, {Edward E.} and Joan Petersilia and Reitz, {Kevin R}",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1086/688616",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "46",
pages = "279--338",
journal = "Crime and Justice",
issn = "0192-3234",
publisher = "University of Chicago",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The future of parole release

AU - Rhine, Edward E.

AU - Petersilia, Joan

AU - Reitz, Kevin R

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - American parole boards have played a critical role in the formulation and administration of states' prison policies in recent decades- and could play an equally important part in helping end mass incarceration. Long neglected by academic, research, and policy communities, systems of discretionary prison release are in need of improvement, if not "reinvention." A plan for revitalization of parole release should lay out a comprehensive and aspirational model for the future. It must address the institutional structure of parole boards, how much release discretion they are given, the substantive grounds for release decisions, the use of risk assessments in the decisional process, decisionmaking tools such as parole release guidelines, the requirements of fair and reliable procedures, victims' rights at parole hearings, the need for parole supervision in some but not all cases, the intensity of parole conditions, and the length of parole supervision.

AB - American parole boards have played a critical role in the formulation and administration of states' prison policies in recent decades- and could play an equally important part in helping end mass incarceration. Long neglected by academic, research, and policy communities, systems of discretionary prison release are in need of improvement, if not "reinvention." A plan for revitalization of parole release should lay out a comprehensive and aspirational model for the future. It must address the institutional structure of parole boards, how much release discretion they are given, the substantive grounds for release decisions, the use of risk assessments in the decisional process, decisionmaking tools such as parole release guidelines, the requirements of fair and reliable procedures, victims' rights at parole hearings, the need for parole supervision in some but not all cases, the intensity of parole conditions, and the length of parole supervision.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85017223159&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85017223159&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1086/688616

DO - 10.1086/688616

M3 - Review article

VL - 46

SP - 279

EP - 338

JO - Crime and Justice

JF - Crime and Justice

SN - 0192-3234

IS - 1

ER -