The Federal Role in Sentencing Law and Policy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Compared to some other areas of governmental activity, the federal presence in the realm of sentencing law and policy has remained insignificant. Setting aside the growth in federal criminal jurisdiction per se, which still accounts for less than 8 percent of all incarcerated offenders, Congress historically has shown little interest in influencing the goals or the particulars of state sentencing systems and has done little to help fund those systems. This may, however, be changing. There are now calls to expand the federal government's role in both paying for and controlling the contours of criminal punishment at the state level. These developments raise long-term questions concerning the appropriate allocation of federal, state, and local authority over sentencing law. Surprisingly, very little consideration has been given to these issues. This article suggests a pragmatic analysis for addressing them. It posits that, for the foreseeable future, it would be a mistake to move toward a federally dominated national sentencing policy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)116-129
Number of pages14
JournalThe ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science
Volume543
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1996

Fingerprint

Law
federal state
Federal Government
jurisdiction
offender
penalty
pragmatics

Cite this

The Federal Role in Sentencing Law and Policy. / Reitz, Kevin R.

In: The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 543, No. 1, 01.01.1996, p. 116-129.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f4d6e87d515c41d6847d44284589acfd,
title = "The Federal Role in Sentencing Law and Policy",
abstract = "Compared to some other areas of governmental activity, the federal presence in the realm of sentencing law and policy has remained insignificant. Setting aside the growth in federal criminal jurisdiction per se, which still accounts for less than 8 percent of all incarcerated offenders, Congress historically has shown little interest in influencing the goals or the particulars of state sentencing systems and has done little to help fund those systems. This may, however, be changing. There are now calls to expand the federal government's role in both paying for and controlling the contours of criminal punishment at the state level. These developments raise long-term questions concerning the appropriate allocation of federal, state, and local authority over sentencing law. Surprisingly, very little consideration has been given to these issues. This article suggests a pragmatic analysis for addressing them. It posits that, for the foreseeable future, it would be a mistake to move toward a federally dominated national sentencing policy.",
author = "Reitz, {Kevin R.}",
year = "1996",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0002716296543001011",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "543",
pages = "116--129",
journal = "Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science",
issn = "0002-7162",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Federal Role in Sentencing Law and Policy

AU - Reitz, Kevin R.

PY - 1996/1/1

Y1 - 1996/1/1

N2 - Compared to some other areas of governmental activity, the federal presence in the realm of sentencing law and policy has remained insignificant. Setting aside the growth in federal criminal jurisdiction per se, which still accounts for less than 8 percent of all incarcerated offenders, Congress historically has shown little interest in influencing the goals or the particulars of state sentencing systems and has done little to help fund those systems. This may, however, be changing. There are now calls to expand the federal government's role in both paying for and controlling the contours of criminal punishment at the state level. These developments raise long-term questions concerning the appropriate allocation of federal, state, and local authority over sentencing law. Surprisingly, very little consideration has been given to these issues. This article suggests a pragmatic analysis for addressing them. It posits that, for the foreseeable future, it would be a mistake to move toward a federally dominated national sentencing policy.

AB - Compared to some other areas of governmental activity, the federal presence in the realm of sentencing law and policy has remained insignificant. Setting aside the growth in federal criminal jurisdiction per se, which still accounts for less than 8 percent of all incarcerated offenders, Congress historically has shown little interest in influencing the goals or the particulars of state sentencing systems and has done little to help fund those systems. This may, however, be changing. There are now calls to expand the federal government's role in both paying for and controlling the contours of criminal punishment at the state level. These developments raise long-term questions concerning the appropriate allocation of federal, state, and local authority over sentencing law. Surprisingly, very little consideration has been given to these issues. This article suggests a pragmatic analysis for addressing them. It posits that, for the foreseeable future, it would be a mistake to move toward a federally dominated national sentencing policy.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030541483&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030541483&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0002716296543001011

DO - 10.1177/0002716296543001011

M3 - Article

VL - 543

SP - 116

EP - 129

JO - Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science

JF - Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science

SN - 0002-7162

IS - 1

ER -