The evidence base for effectiveness of preparedness training: A retrospective analysis

Margaret A. Potter, Kathleen R. Miner, Daniel J. Barnett, Rebecca Cadigan, Laura Lloyd, Debra K. Olson, Cindy Parker, Elena Savoia, Kimberley Shoaf

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives. In 2007, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) commissioned an Evidence-Based Gaps Collaboration Group to consider whether past experience could help guide future efforts to educate and train public health workers in responding to emergencies and disasters. Methods. The Group searched the peer-reviewed literature for preparedness training articles meeting three criteria: publication during the period when CDC's Centers for Public Health Preparedness were fully operational, content relevant to emergency response operations, and content particular to the emergency response roles of public health professionals. Articles underwent both quantitative and qualitative analyses. Results. The search identified 163 articles covering the topics of leadership and command structure (18.4%), information and communications (14.1%), organizational systems (78.5%), and others (23.9%). The number of reports was substantial, but their usefulness for trainers and educators was rated only "fair" to "good." Thematic analysis of 137 articles found that organizational topics far outnumbered leadership, command structure, and communications topics. Disconnects among critical participants - including trainers, policy makers, and public health agencies - were noted. Generalizable evaluations were rare. Conclusions. Reviews of progress in preparedness training for the public health workforce should be repeated in the future. Governmental investment in training for preparedness should continue. Future training programs should be grounded in policy and practice needs, and evaluations should be based on performance improvement.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)15-23
Number of pages9
JournalPublic Health Reports
Volume125
Issue numberSUPPL. 5
StatePublished - Dec 7 2010

Fingerprint

Public Health
Emergencies
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U.S.)
Communication
Health Manpower
Peer Group
Disasters
Administrative Personnel
Publications
Education

Cite this

Potter, M. A., Miner, K. R., Barnett, D. J., Cadigan, R., Lloyd, L., Olson, D. K., ... Shoaf, K. (2010). The evidence base for effectiveness of preparedness training: A retrospective analysis. Public Health Reports, 125(SUPPL. 5), 15-23.

The evidence base for effectiveness of preparedness training : A retrospective analysis. / Potter, Margaret A.; Miner, Kathleen R.; Barnett, Daniel J.; Cadigan, Rebecca; Lloyd, Laura; Olson, Debra K.; Parker, Cindy; Savoia, Elena; Shoaf, Kimberley.

In: Public Health Reports, Vol. 125, No. SUPPL. 5, 07.12.2010, p. 15-23.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Potter, MA, Miner, KR, Barnett, DJ, Cadigan, R, Lloyd, L, Olson, DK, Parker, C, Savoia, E & Shoaf, K 2010, 'The evidence base for effectiveness of preparedness training: A retrospective analysis', Public Health Reports, vol. 125, no. SUPPL. 5, pp. 15-23.
Potter MA, Miner KR, Barnett DJ, Cadigan R, Lloyd L, Olson DK et al. The evidence base for effectiveness of preparedness training: A retrospective analysis. Public Health Reports. 2010 Dec 7;125(SUPPL. 5):15-23.
Potter, Margaret A. ; Miner, Kathleen R. ; Barnett, Daniel J. ; Cadigan, Rebecca ; Lloyd, Laura ; Olson, Debra K. ; Parker, Cindy ; Savoia, Elena ; Shoaf, Kimberley. / The evidence base for effectiveness of preparedness training : A retrospective analysis. In: Public Health Reports. 2010 ; Vol. 125, No. SUPPL. 5. pp. 15-23.
@article{914fa509437c4c1fb7aa70dd30d22d54,
title = "The evidence base for effectiveness of preparedness training: A retrospective analysis",
abstract = "Objectives. In 2007, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) commissioned an Evidence-Based Gaps Collaboration Group to consider whether past experience could help guide future efforts to educate and train public health workers in responding to emergencies and disasters. Methods. The Group searched the peer-reviewed literature for preparedness training articles meeting three criteria: publication during the period when CDC's Centers for Public Health Preparedness were fully operational, content relevant to emergency response operations, and content particular to the emergency response roles of public health professionals. Articles underwent both quantitative and qualitative analyses. Results. The search identified 163 articles covering the topics of leadership and command structure (18.4{\%}), information and communications (14.1{\%}), organizational systems (78.5{\%}), and others (23.9{\%}). The number of reports was substantial, but their usefulness for trainers and educators was rated only {"}fair{"} to {"}good.{"} Thematic analysis of 137 articles found that organizational topics far outnumbered leadership, command structure, and communications topics. Disconnects among critical participants - including trainers, policy makers, and public health agencies - were noted. Generalizable evaluations were rare. Conclusions. Reviews of progress in preparedness training for the public health workforce should be repeated in the future. Governmental investment in training for preparedness should continue. Future training programs should be grounded in policy and practice needs, and evaluations should be based on performance improvement.",
author = "Potter, {Margaret A.} and Miner, {Kathleen R.} and Barnett, {Daniel J.} and Rebecca Cadigan and Laura Lloyd and Olson, {Debra K.} and Cindy Parker and Elena Savoia and Kimberley Shoaf",
year = "2010",
month = "12",
day = "7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "125",
pages = "15--23",
journal = "Public Health Reports",
issn = "0033-3549",
publisher = "Association of Schools of Public Health",
number = "SUPPL. 5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The evidence base for effectiveness of preparedness training

T2 - A retrospective analysis

AU - Potter, Margaret A.

AU - Miner, Kathleen R.

AU - Barnett, Daniel J.

AU - Cadigan, Rebecca

AU - Lloyd, Laura

AU - Olson, Debra K.

AU - Parker, Cindy

AU - Savoia, Elena

AU - Shoaf, Kimberley

PY - 2010/12/7

Y1 - 2010/12/7

N2 - Objectives. In 2007, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) commissioned an Evidence-Based Gaps Collaboration Group to consider whether past experience could help guide future efforts to educate and train public health workers in responding to emergencies and disasters. Methods. The Group searched the peer-reviewed literature for preparedness training articles meeting three criteria: publication during the period when CDC's Centers for Public Health Preparedness were fully operational, content relevant to emergency response operations, and content particular to the emergency response roles of public health professionals. Articles underwent both quantitative and qualitative analyses. Results. The search identified 163 articles covering the topics of leadership and command structure (18.4%), information and communications (14.1%), organizational systems (78.5%), and others (23.9%). The number of reports was substantial, but their usefulness for trainers and educators was rated only "fair" to "good." Thematic analysis of 137 articles found that organizational topics far outnumbered leadership, command structure, and communications topics. Disconnects among critical participants - including trainers, policy makers, and public health agencies - were noted. Generalizable evaluations were rare. Conclusions. Reviews of progress in preparedness training for the public health workforce should be repeated in the future. Governmental investment in training for preparedness should continue. Future training programs should be grounded in policy and practice needs, and evaluations should be based on performance improvement.

AB - Objectives. In 2007, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) commissioned an Evidence-Based Gaps Collaboration Group to consider whether past experience could help guide future efforts to educate and train public health workers in responding to emergencies and disasters. Methods. The Group searched the peer-reviewed literature for preparedness training articles meeting three criteria: publication during the period when CDC's Centers for Public Health Preparedness were fully operational, content relevant to emergency response operations, and content particular to the emergency response roles of public health professionals. Articles underwent both quantitative and qualitative analyses. Results. The search identified 163 articles covering the topics of leadership and command structure (18.4%), information and communications (14.1%), organizational systems (78.5%), and others (23.9%). The number of reports was substantial, but their usefulness for trainers and educators was rated only "fair" to "good." Thematic analysis of 137 articles found that organizational topics far outnumbered leadership, command structure, and communications topics. Disconnects among critical participants - including trainers, policy makers, and public health agencies - were noted. Generalizable evaluations were rare. Conclusions. Reviews of progress in preparedness training for the public health workforce should be repeated in the future. Governmental investment in training for preparedness should continue. Future training programs should be grounded in policy and practice needs, and evaluations should be based on performance improvement.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78649648932&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78649648932&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 21133061

AN - SCOPUS:78649648932

VL - 125

SP - 15

EP - 23

JO - Public Health Reports

JF - Public Health Reports

SN - 0033-3549

IS - SUPPL. 5

ER -