The evaluation of illness behavior and exaggeration of disability

J. R. Clayer, C. L. Bookless-Pratz, M. W. Ross

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The evaluation of illness behaviour can be complicated by subjective influences in either the patient or the clinician; these often arise in the evaluation of persons seeking compensation for injuries in which the symptoms are apparently exaggerated. The present study attempts to assess the usefulness of the CE Scale in determining the degree of conscious exaggeration by compensation claimants. Comparisons were made between psychiatrists' clinical evaluations of claimants and the scores obtained on this scale. The relationship between these two measures was found to be significant at the 1% level and specificity and sensitivity for less than 25% exaggeration on psychiatrists rating with a CE Scale cut-off of 11.69% and 100% respectively: for less than 34% exaggeration, they were 88% and 83%.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)296-299
Number of pages4
JournalBritish Journal of Psychiatry
Volume148
Issue numberMAR.
StatePublished - Jan 1 1986

Fingerprint

Illness Behavior
Psychiatry
Sensitivity and Specificity
Wounds and Injuries

Cite this

Clayer, J. R., Bookless-Pratz, C. L., & Ross, M. W. (1986). The evaluation of illness behavior and exaggeration of disability. British Journal of Psychiatry, 148(MAR.), 296-299.

The evaluation of illness behavior and exaggeration of disability. / Clayer, J. R.; Bookless-Pratz, C. L.; Ross, M. W.

In: British Journal of Psychiatry, Vol. 148, No. MAR., 01.01.1986, p. 296-299.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Clayer, JR, Bookless-Pratz, CL & Ross, MW 1986, 'The evaluation of illness behavior and exaggeration of disability', British Journal of Psychiatry, vol. 148, no. MAR., pp. 296-299.
Clayer JR, Bookless-Pratz CL, Ross MW. The evaluation of illness behavior and exaggeration of disability. British Journal of Psychiatry. 1986 Jan 1;148(MAR.):296-299.
Clayer, J. R. ; Bookless-Pratz, C. L. ; Ross, M. W. / The evaluation of illness behavior and exaggeration of disability. In: British Journal of Psychiatry. 1986 ; Vol. 148, No. MAR. pp. 296-299.
@article{d8c14c793daf4adba30902927d0009ed,
title = "The evaluation of illness behavior and exaggeration of disability",
abstract = "The evaluation of illness behaviour can be complicated by subjective influences in either the patient or the clinician; these often arise in the evaluation of persons seeking compensation for injuries in which the symptoms are apparently exaggerated. The present study attempts to assess the usefulness of the CE Scale in determining the degree of conscious exaggeration by compensation claimants. Comparisons were made between psychiatrists' clinical evaluations of claimants and the scores obtained on this scale. The relationship between these two measures was found to be significant at the 1{\%} level and specificity and sensitivity for less than 25{\%} exaggeration on psychiatrists rating with a CE Scale cut-off of 11.69{\%} and 100{\%} respectively: for less than 34{\%} exaggeration, they were 88{\%} and 83{\%}.",
author = "Clayer, {J. R.} and Bookless-Pratz, {C. L.} and Ross, {M. W.}",
year = "1986",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "148",
pages = "296--299",
journal = "British Journal of Psychiatry",
issn = "0007-1250",
publisher = "Royal College of Psychiatrists",
number = "MAR.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The evaluation of illness behavior and exaggeration of disability

AU - Clayer, J. R.

AU - Bookless-Pratz, C. L.

AU - Ross, M. W.

PY - 1986/1/1

Y1 - 1986/1/1

N2 - The evaluation of illness behaviour can be complicated by subjective influences in either the patient or the clinician; these often arise in the evaluation of persons seeking compensation for injuries in which the symptoms are apparently exaggerated. The present study attempts to assess the usefulness of the CE Scale in determining the degree of conscious exaggeration by compensation claimants. Comparisons were made between psychiatrists' clinical evaluations of claimants and the scores obtained on this scale. The relationship between these two measures was found to be significant at the 1% level and specificity and sensitivity for less than 25% exaggeration on psychiatrists rating with a CE Scale cut-off of 11.69% and 100% respectively: for less than 34% exaggeration, they were 88% and 83%.

AB - The evaluation of illness behaviour can be complicated by subjective influences in either the patient or the clinician; these often arise in the evaluation of persons seeking compensation for injuries in which the symptoms are apparently exaggerated. The present study attempts to assess the usefulness of the CE Scale in determining the degree of conscious exaggeration by compensation claimants. Comparisons were made between psychiatrists' clinical evaluations of claimants and the scores obtained on this scale. The relationship between these two measures was found to be significant at the 1% level and specificity and sensitivity for less than 25% exaggeration on psychiatrists rating with a CE Scale cut-off of 11.69% and 100% respectively: for less than 34% exaggeration, they were 88% and 83%.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0022680717&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0022680717&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 148

SP - 296

EP - 299

JO - British Journal of Psychiatry

JF - British Journal of Psychiatry

SN - 0007-1250

IS - MAR.

ER -