TY - JOUR
T1 - The estimated costs and benefits of a hypothetical supervised consumption site in Providence, Rhode Island
AU - Chambers, Laura C.
AU - Hallowell, Benjamin D.
AU - Zang, Xiao
AU - Rind, David M.
AU - Guzauskas, Greg F.
AU - Hansen, Ryan N.
AU - Fuchs, Nathaniel
AU - Scagos, Rachel P.
AU - Marshall, Brandon D.L.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2022/10
Y1 - 2022/10
N2 - Background: Overdose deaths have increased dramatically in the United States, including in Rhode Island. In July 2021, the Rhode Island government passed legislation supporting a two-year pilot program authorizing supervised consumption sites (SCSs) in response to this crisis. We estimated the costs and benefits of a hypothetical SCS in Providence, Rhode Island. Methods: We utilized a decision analytic mathematical model to compare costs and outcomes for people who inject drugs under two scenarios: (1) a SCS that includes syringe services provision, and (2) a syringe service program only (i.e., status quo). We assumed 0.95% of injections result in overdose, the SCS would serve 400 clients monthly and have a net cost of $783,899 annually, 46% of overdoses occurring outside of the SCS result in an ambulance run and 43% result in an emergency department (ED) visit, 0.79% of overdoses occurring within the SCS result in an ambulance run and ED visit, and the SCS would lead to a 25.7% reduction in fatal overdoses near the site. The model was developed from a modified societal perspective with a one-year time horizon. Results: A hypothetical SCS in Providence would prevent approximately 2 overdose deaths, 261 ambulance runs, 244 ED visits, and 117 inpatient hospitalizations for emergency overdose care annually compared to a scenario that includes a syringe service program only. The SCS would save $1,104,454 annually compared to the syringe service program only, accounting only for facility costs and short-term costs of emergency overdose care and ignoring savings associated with averted deaths. Influential parameters included the percentage of injections resulting in overdose, the total annual injections at the SCS, and the percentage of overdoses outside of the SCS that result in an ED visit. Conclusion: A SCS in would result in substantial cost savings due to prevention of costly emergency overdose care.
AB - Background: Overdose deaths have increased dramatically in the United States, including in Rhode Island. In July 2021, the Rhode Island government passed legislation supporting a two-year pilot program authorizing supervised consumption sites (SCSs) in response to this crisis. We estimated the costs and benefits of a hypothetical SCS in Providence, Rhode Island. Methods: We utilized a decision analytic mathematical model to compare costs and outcomes for people who inject drugs under two scenarios: (1) a SCS that includes syringe services provision, and (2) a syringe service program only (i.e., status quo). We assumed 0.95% of injections result in overdose, the SCS would serve 400 clients monthly and have a net cost of $783,899 annually, 46% of overdoses occurring outside of the SCS result in an ambulance run and 43% result in an emergency department (ED) visit, 0.79% of overdoses occurring within the SCS result in an ambulance run and ED visit, and the SCS would lead to a 25.7% reduction in fatal overdoses near the site. The model was developed from a modified societal perspective with a one-year time horizon. Results: A hypothetical SCS in Providence would prevent approximately 2 overdose deaths, 261 ambulance runs, 244 ED visits, and 117 inpatient hospitalizations for emergency overdose care annually compared to a scenario that includes a syringe service program only. The SCS would save $1,104,454 annually compared to the syringe service program only, accounting only for facility costs and short-term costs of emergency overdose care and ignoring savings associated with averted deaths. Influential parameters included the percentage of injections resulting in overdose, the total annual injections at the SCS, and the percentage of overdoses outside of the SCS that result in an ED visit. Conclusion: A SCS in would result in substantial cost savings due to prevention of costly emergency overdose care.
KW - Cost benefit
KW - Cost effectiveness
KW - Harm reduction
KW - Overdose
KW - People who inject drugs
KW - Supervised consumption site
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85135930617&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85135930617&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.drugpo.2022.103820
DO - 10.1016/j.drugpo.2022.103820
M3 - Article
C2 - 35973341
AN - SCOPUS:85135930617
SN - 0955-3959
VL - 108
JO - International Journal of Drug Policy
JF - International Journal of Drug Policy
M1 - 103820
ER -