TY - JOUR
T1 - The effects of a multicomponent colorectal cancer screening intervention on knowledge, recommendation, and screening among underserved populations
AU - Cameron, Kenzie A.
AU - Ramirez-Zohfeld, Vanessa
AU - Ferreira, M. Rosario
AU - Dolan, Nancy C.
AU - Radosta, Jonathan
AU - Galanter, William L.
AU - Eder, Milton “Mickey”
AU - Wolf, Michael S.
AU - Rademaker, Alfred W.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Meharry Medical College.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - This trial tested a multicomponent intervention to increase colorectal cancer (CRC) screening among underserved patients. Participants were randomized to: (1) physician + patient intervention, (2) physician-only intervention, or (3) usual care (UC). Study outcomes included patient knowledge, physician recommendation of CRC screening, and screening completion via colonoscopy or stool tests. Among 538 participants, those exposed to the physician + patient intervention had significantly increased knowledge over patients in physician-only (p=.0008) or UC arms (p=.0003). However, there were no statistically significant differences in completion of CRC screening, with 10%, 20%, and 16% of UC, physician-only, and physician + patient participants screened, respectively. In UC, all completed screenings were colonoscopy, whereas in the physician-only and physician + patient arms, 39% and 46% of completed tests were via stool test, respectively. The multicomponent intervention did not increase overall CRC screening, yet results underscore the need to provide patients options for completing CRC screening.
AB - This trial tested a multicomponent intervention to increase colorectal cancer (CRC) screening among underserved patients. Participants were randomized to: (1) physician + patient intervention, (2) physician-only intervention, or (3) usual care (UC). Study outcomes included patient knowledge, physician recommendation of CRC screening, and screening completion via colonoscopy or stool tests. Among 538 participants, those exposed to the physician + patient intervention had significantly increased knowledge over patients in physician-only (p=.0008) or UC arms (p=.0003). However, there were no statistically significant differences in completion of CRC screening, with 10%, 20%, and 16% of UC, physician-only, and physician + patient participants screened, respectively. In UC, all completed screenings were colonoscopy, whereas in the physician-only and physician + patient arms, 39% and 46% of completed tests were via stool test, respectively. The multicomponent intervention did not increase overall CRC screening, yet results underscore the need to provide patients options for completing CRC screening.
KW - Colorectal cancer
KW - Quality improvement
KW - Racial/ethnic disparities
KW - Screening
KW - Screening modalities
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85096794423&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85096794423&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1353/hpu.2020.0122
DO - 10.1353/hpu.2020.0122
M3 - Article
C2 - 33416742
AN - SCOPUS:85096794423
SN - 1049-2089
VL - 31
SP - 1612
EP - 1633
JO - Journal of health care for the poor and underserved
JF - Journal of health care for the poor and underserved
IS - 4
ER -