The Effects of a Housing Mobility Experiment on Participants’ Residential Environments

Quynh C. Nguyen, Dolores Acevedo-Garcia, Nicole M. Schmidt, Theresa L. Osypuk

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We used the Moving to Opportunity (MTO) housing experiment to inform how Housing Choice Vouchers and housing mobility policies can assist families living in high-poverty areas to make opportunity moves to higher quality neighborhoods, across a wide range of neighborhood attributes. We compared the neighborhood attainment of the three randomly assigned MTO treatment groups (low-poverty voucher, Section 8 voucher, control group) at 1997 and 2002 locations (4–7 years after baseline), using survey reports, and by linking residential histories to numerous different administrative and population-based data sets. Compared with controls, families in low-poverty and Section 8 groups experienced substantial improvements in neighborhood conditions across diverse measures, including economic conditions, social systems (e.g., collective efficacy), physical features of the environment (e.g., tree cover) and health outcomes. The low-poverty voucher group, moreover, achieved better neighborhood attainment compared with Section 8. Treatment effects were largest for New York, New York, and Los Angeles, California. We discuss the implications of our findings for expanding affordable housing policy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)419-448
JournalHousing Policy Debate
Volume27
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2017

Fingerprint

residential environment
housing
poverty
experiment
Group
baseline survey
affordable housing
housing policy
economic conditions
social system
effect
history
health
economics

Keywords

  • HUD (U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development)
  • low-income housing
  • neighborhood
  • policy
  • rental housing
  • underserved

Cite this

The Effects of a Housing Mobility Experiment on Participants’ Residential Environments. / Nguyen, Quynh C.; Acevedo-Garcia, Dolores; Schmidt, Nicole M.; Osypuk, Theresa L.

In: Housing Policy Debate, Vol. 27, No. 3, 2017, p. 419-448.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c9ef59a28c324ad997fedcde1e8c7dee,
title = "The Effects of a Housing Mobility Experiment on Participants’ Residential Environments",
abstract = "We used the Moving to Opportunity (MTO) housing experiment to inform how Housing Choice Vouchers and housing mobility policies can assist families living in high-poverty areas to make opportunity moves to higher quality neighborhoods, across a wide range of neighborhood attributes. We compared the neighborhood attainment of the three randomly assigned MTO treatment groups (low-poverty voucher, Section 8 voucher, control group) at 1997 and 2002 locations (4–7 years after baseline), using survey reports, and by linking residential histories to numerous different administrative and population-based data sets. Compared with controls, families in low-poverty and Section 8 groups experienced substantial improvements in neighborhood conditions across diverse measures, including economic conditions, social systems (e.g., collective efficacy), physical features of the environment (e.g., tree cover) and health outcomes. The low-poverty voucher group, moreover, achieved better neighborhood attainment compared with Section 8. Treatment effects were largest for New York, New York, and Los Angeles, California. We discuss the implications of our findings for expanding affordable housing policy.",
keywords = "HUD (U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development), low-income housing, neighborhood, policy, rental housing, underserved",
author = "Nguyen, {Quynh C.} and Dolores Acevedo-Garcia and Schmidt, {Nicole M.} and Osypuk, {Theresa L.}",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1080/10511482.2016.1245210",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "419--448",
journal = "Housing Policy Debate",
issn = "1051-1482",
publisher = "Taylor Graham Publishing",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Effects of a Housing Mobility Experiment on Participants’ Residential Environments

AU - Nguyen, Quynh C.

AU - Acevedo-Garcia, Dolores

AU - Schmidt, Nicole M.

AU - Osypuk, Theresa L.

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - We used the Moving to Opportunity (MTO) housing experiment to inform how Housing Choice Vouchers and housing mobility policies can assist families living in high-poverty areas to make opportunity moves to higher quality neighborhoods, across a wide range of neighborhood attributes. We compared the neighborhood attainment of the three randomly assigned MTO treatment groups (low-poverty voucher, Section 8 voucher, control group) at 1997 and 2002 locations (4–7 years after baseline), using survey reports, and by linking residential histories to numerous different administrative and population-based data sets. Compared with controls, families in low-poverty and Section 8 groups experienced substantial improvements in neighborhood conditions across diverse measures, including economic conditions, social systems (e.g., collective efficacy), physical features of the environment (e.g., tree cover) and health outcomes. The low-poverty voucher group, moreover, achieved better neighborhood attainment compared with Section 8. Treatment effects were largest for New York, New York, and Los Angeles, California. We discuss the implications of our findings for expanding affordable housing policy.

AB - We used the Moving to Opportunity (MTO) housing experiment to inform how Housing Choice Vouchers and housing mobility policies can assist families living in high-poverty areas to make opportunity moves to higher quality neighborhoods, across a wide range of neighborhood attributes. We compared the neighborhood attainment of the three randomly assigned MTO treatment groups (low-poverty voucher, Section 8 voucher, control group) at 1997 and 2002 locations (4–7 years after baseline), using survey reports, and by linking residential histories to numerous different administrative and population-based data sets. Compared with controls, families in low-poverty and Section 8 groups experienced substantial improvements in neighborhood conditions across diverse measures, including economic conditions, social systems (e.g., collective efficacy), physical features of the environment (e.g., tree cover) and health outcomes. The low-poverty voucher group, moreover, achieved better neighborhood attainment compared with Section 8. Treatment effects were largest for New York, New York, and Los Angeles, California. We discuss the implications of our findings for expanding affordable housing policy.

KW - HUD (U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development)

KW - low-income housing

KW - neighborhood

KW - policy

KW - rental housing

KW - underserved

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84996866507&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84996866507&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10511482.2016.1245210

DO - 10.1080/10511482.2016.1245210

M3 - Article

VL - 27

SP - 419

EP - 448

JO - Housing Policy Debate

JF - Housing Policy Debate

SN - 1051-1482

IS - 3

ER -