TY - JOUR
T1 - The effect of percutaneous coronary intervention after extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation on survival for out of hospital cardiac arrest
T2 - a causal inference analysis
AU - Alhuneafat, Laith
AU - Murray, Thomas A.
AU - Johnson, Nicholas J.
AU - Hsu, Cindy
AU - Grunau, Brian
AU - Alexy, Tamas
AU - Yannopoulos, Demetris
AU - Bartos, Jason
AU - Tonna, Joseph E.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s)
PY - 2025/11
Y1 - 2025/11
N2 - Background: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) improves survival in acute coronary syndromes and has been used in recent randomized trials of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR). However, the role of PCI during ECPR for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) remains uncertain. Methods: We analyzed adult patients with OHCA from the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) Registry from January 2020 to December 2022 who underwent ECPR at high-volume centers. Patients were stratified by PCI receipt. We applied propensity-score weighting to balance covariates predicting the probability of receipt of PCI including year, age, sex, race, quantitative burden of comorbidities, CPR duration prior to ECMO flow start, initial cardiac arrest rhythm, and center-level case volume. The primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge. We estimated adjusted odds ratios (aORs) using multivariable logistic regression and inverse probability weighting (IPW). Results: Among 576 adult OHCA patients who received ECPR, 138 (24.3 %) received PCI. PCI patients were more likely to arrest at home (59.4 % vs. 46.1 %; p = 0.049) and have higher a greater initial incidence rates of ventricular fibrillation (VF) as the first detected rhythm (68.1 % vs. 48.9 %; p < 0.001). Survival to hospital discharge was similar between groups (PCI: 18.1 %, non-PCI: 20.1 %). Adjusted causal inference analyses, including multivariable logistic regression (OR 0.99, 95 % CI: 0.56–1.75, p = 0.98), inverse probability weighting (OR 1.03, 95 % CI: 0.58–1.82, p = 0.93), and augmented IPW models (OR 1.06, 95 % CI: 0.58–1.93, p = 0.85), showed no statistically significant association between PCI and survival to hospital discharge. Conclusions: PCI was not associated with improved survival in adult ECPR patients. These findings highlight the need for further prospective studies to clarify the role of PCI in ECPR and identify patient populations that may benefit from this intervention.
AB - Background: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) improves survival in acute coronary syndromes and has been used in recent randomized trials of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR). However, the role of PCI during ECPR for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) remains uncertain. Methods: We analyzed adult patients with OHCA from the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) Registry from January 2020 to December 2022 who underwent ECPR at high-volume centers. Patients were stratified by PCI receipt. We applied propensity-score weighting to balance covariates predicting the probability of receipt of PCI including year, age, sex, race, quantitative burden of comorbidities, CPR duration prior to ECMO flow start, initial cardiac arrest rhythm, and center-level case volume. The primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge. We estimated adjusted odds ratios (aORs) using multivariable logistic regression and inverse probability weighting (IPW). Results: Among 576 adult OHCA patients who received ECPR, 138 (24.3 %) received PCI. PCI patients were more likely to arrest at home (59.4 % vs. 46.1 %; p = 0.049) and have higher a greater initial incidence rates of ventricular fibrillation (VF) as the first detected rhythm (68.1 % vs. 48.9 %; p < 0.001). Survival to hospital discharge was similar between groups (PCI: 18.1 %, non-PCI: 20.1 %). Adjusted causal inference analyses, including multivariable logistic regression (OR 0.99, 95 % CI: 0.56–1.75, p = 0.98), inverse probability weighting (OR 1.03, 95 % CI: 0.58–1.82, p = 0.93), and augmented IPW models (OR 1.06, 95 % CI: 0.58–1.93, p = 0.85), showed no statistically significant association between PCI and survival to hospital discharge. Conclusions: PCI was not associated with improved survival in adult ECPR patients. These findings highlight the need for further prospective studies to clarify the role of PCI in ECPR and identify patient populations that may benefit from this intervention.
KW - ECM
KW - Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation
KW - Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
KW - Percutaneous coronary intervention
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105018200167
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105018200167#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1016/j.resplu.2025.101103
DO - 10.1016/j.resplu.2025.101103
M3 - Article
C2 - 41142212
AN - SCOPUS:105018200167
SN - 2666-5204
VL - 26
JO - Resuscitation Plus
JF - Resuscitation Plus
M1 - 101103
ER -