The edge of stigma: An experimental audit of the effects of low-level criminal records on employment

Christopher Uggen, Mike Vuolo, Sarah Lageson, Ebony Ruhland, K. Hilary Whitham

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

60 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Ample experimental evidence shows that the stigma of a prison record reduces employment opportunities (Pager, 2007). Yet background checks today uncover a much broader range of impropriety, including arrests for minor crimes never resulting in formal charges. This article probes the lesser boundaries of stigma, asking whether and how employers consider low-level arrests in hiring decisions. Matched pairs of young African American and White men were sent to apply for 300 entry-level jobs, with one member of each pair reporting a disorderly conduct arrest that did not lead to conviction. We find a modest but nontrivial effect, with employer callback rates about 4 percentage points lower for the experimental group than for the matched control group. Interviews with the audited employers suggest three mechanisms to account for the lesser stigma of misdemeanor arrests relative to felony convictions: 1) greater employer discretion and authority in the former case; 2) calibration of the severity, nature, and timing of the offense; and 3) a deeply held presumption of innocence, which contrasts the uncertainty of arrest with the greater certainty represented by convictions. In addition, personal contact and workplace diversity play important roles in the hiring process.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)627-654
Number of pages28
JournalCriminology
Volume52
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014

Fingerprint

Prisons
Crime
audit
Workplace
African Americans
Calibration
Uncertainty
employer
Research Design
Interviews
Control Groups
hiring
offense
misdemeanor
entry level
employment opportunity
role play
correctional institution
workplace
Group

Keywords

  • Arrest
  • Employment
  • Experimental

Cite this

The edge of stigma : An experimental audit of the effects of low-level criminal records on employment. / Uggen, Christopher; Vuolo, Mike; Lageson, Sarah; Ruhland, Ebony; Whitham, K. Hilary.

In: Criminology, Vol. 52, No. 4, 01.01.2014, p. 627-654.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Uggen, Christopher ; Vuolo, Mike ; Lageson, Sarah ; Ruhland, Ebony ; Whitham, K. Hilary. / The edge of stigma : An experimental audit of the effects of low-level criminal records on employment. In: Criminology. 2014 ; Vol. 52, No. 4. pp. 627-654.
@article{e7d4b6cc5874426a8bfb634f2fda6ae1,
title = "The edge of stigma: An experimental audit of the effects of low-level criminal records on employment",
abstract = "Ample experimental evidence shows that the stigma of a prison record reduces employment opportunities (Pager, 2007). Yet background checks today uncover a much broader range of impropriety, including arrests for minor crimes never resulting in formal charges. This article probes the lesser boundaries of stigma, asking whether and how employers consider low-level arrests in hiring decisions. Matched pairs of young African American and White men were sent to apply for 300 entry-level jobs, with one member of each pair reporting a disorderly conduct arrest that did not lead to conviction. We find a modest but nontrivial effect, with employer callback rates about 4 percentage points lower for the experimental group than for the matched control group. Interviews with the audited employers suggest three mechanisms to account for the lesser stigma of misdemeanor arrests relative to felony convictions: 1) greater employer discretion and authority in the former case; 2) calibration of the severity, nature, and timing of the offense; and 3) a deeply held presumption of innocence, which contrasts the uncertainty of arrest with the greater certainty represented by convictions. In addition, personal contact and workplace diversity play important roles in the hiring process.",
keywords = "Arrest, Employment, Experimental",
author = "Christopher Uggen and Mike Vuolo and Sarah Lageson and Ebony Ruhland and Whitham, {K. Hilary}",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/1745-9125.12051",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "52",
pages = "627--654",
journal = "Criminology",
issn = "0011-1384",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The edge of stigma

T2 - An experimental audit of the effects of low-level criminal records on employment

AU - Uggen, Christopher

AU - Vuolo, Mike

AU - Lageson, Sarah

AU - Ruhland, Ebony

AU - Whitham, K. Hilary

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - Ample experimental evidence shows that the stigma of a prison record reduces employment opportunities (Pager, 2007). Yet background checks today uncover a much broader range of impropriety, including arrests for minor crimes never resulting in formal charges. This article probes the lesser boundaries of stigma, asking whether and how employers consider low-level arrests in hiring decisions. Matched pairs of young African American and White men were sent to apply for 300 entry-level jobs, with one member of each pair reporting a disorderly conduct arrest that did not lead to conviction. We find a modest but nontrivial effect, with employer callback rates about 4 percentage points lower for the experimental group than for the matched control group. Interviews with the audited employers suggest three mechanisms to account for the lesser stigma of misdemeanor arrests relative to felony convictions: 1) greater employer discretion and authority in the former case; 2) calibration of the severity, nature, and timing of the offense; and 3) a deeply held presumption of innocence, which contrasts the uncertainty of arrest with the greater certainty represented by convictions. In addition, personal contact and workplace diversity play important roles in the hiring process.

AB - Ample experimental evidence shows that the stigma of a prison record reduces employment opportunities (Pager, 2007). Yet background checks today uncover a much broader range of impropriety, including arrests for minor crimes never resulting in formal charges. This article probes the lesser boundaries of stigma, asking whether and how employers consider low-level arrests in hiring decisions. Matched pairs of young African American and White men were sent to apply for 300 entry-level jobs, with one member of each pair reporting a disorderly conduct arrest that did not lead to conviction. We find a modest but nontrivial effect, with employer callback rates about 4 percentage points lower for the experimental group than for the matched control group. Interviews with the audited employers suggest three mechanisms to account for the lesser stigma of misdemeanor arrests relative to felony convictions: 1) greater employer discretion and authority in the former case; 2) calibration of the severity, nature, and timing of the offense; and 3) a deeply held presumption of innocence, which contrasts the uncertainty of arrest with the greater certainty represented by convictions. In addition, personal contact and workplace diversity play important roles in the hiring process.

KW - Arrest

KW - Employment

KW - Experimental

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84922968550&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84922968550&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/1745-9125.12051

DO - 10.1111/1745-9125.12051

M3 - Article

VL - 52

SP - 627

EP - 654

JO - Criminology

JF - Criminology

SN - 0011-1384

IS - 4

ER -