The democratizing force of international law: Human rights adjudication by the Indian supreme court

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

This chapter argues that international law has served as a useful tool for the Indian Supreme Court in fulfilling aims that have little to do with the court’s purported status as an organ of the international community. Rather, the Supreme Court has appropriated international legal norms to pursue primarily domestic goals. This chapter proceeds as follows. Section II gives an overview of the status of international law in the Indian constitutional scheme. Section III analyzes the creative uses of international law by the Indian Supreme Court to fill in and add to the content of constitutional rights and guarantees, enabling its encroachment into domains that are normally the prerogative of the legislature and the executive. Section IV puts forward a possible explanation for this appropriation of international legal norms and suggests that international law has performed a legitimizing function in the Supreme Court’s articulation of its vision of the state.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationComparative International Law
PublisherOxford University Press
Pages319-336
Number of pages18
ISBN (Electronic)9780190697570
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

international law
Supreme Court
human rights
legal norm
guarantee
community

Keywords

  • India
  • India supreme court
  • International law
  • International legal norms
  • Trans-judicial dialogue

Cite this

The democratizing force of international law : Human rights adjudication by the Indian supreme court. / Jain, Neha.

Comparative International Law. Oxford University Press, 2018. p. 319-336.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Jain, Neha. / The democratizing force of international law : Human rights adjudication by the Indian supreme court. Comparative International Law. Oxford University Press, 2018. pp. 319-336
@inbook{409af1436f394eb4bf6a3ac7ea0f7dca,
title = "The democratizing force of international law: Human rights adjudication by the Indian supreme court",
abstract = "This chapter argues that international law has served as a useful tool for the Indian Supreme Court in fulfilling aims that have little to do with the court’s purported status as an organ of the international community. Rather, the Supreme Court has appropriated international legal norms to pursue primarily domestic goals. This chapter proceeds as follows. Section II gives an overview of the status of international law in the Indian constitutional scheme. Section III analyzes the creative uses of international law by the Indian Supreme Court to fill in and add to the content of constitutional rights and guarantees, enabling its encroachment into domains that are normally the prerogative of the legislature and the executive. Section IV puts forward a possible explanation for this appropriation of international legal norms and suggests that international law has performed a legitimizing function in the Supreme Court’s articulation of its vision of the state.",
keywords = "India, India supreme court, International law, International legal norms, Trans-judicial dialogue",
author = "Neha Jain",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/oso/9780190697570.003.0015",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "319--336",
booktitle = "Comparative International Law",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
address = "United States",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - The democratizing force of international law

T2 - Human rights adjudication by the Indian supreme court

AU - Jain, Neha

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - This chapter argues that international law has served as a useful tool for the Indian Supreme Court in fulfilling aims that have little to do with the court’s purported status as an organ of the international community. Rather, the Supreme Court has appropriated international legal norms to pursue primarily domestic goals. This chapter proceeds as follows. Section II gives an overview of the status of international law in the Indian constitutional scheme. Section III analyzes the creative uses of international law by the Indian Supreme Court to fill in and add to the content of constitutional rights and guarantees, enabling its encroachment into domains that are normally the prerogative of the legislature and the executive. Section IV puts forward a possible explanation for this appropriation of international legal norms and suggests that international law has performed a legitimizing function in the Supreme Court’s articulation of its vision of the state.

AB - This chapter argues that international law has served as a useful tool for the Indian Supreme Court in fulfilling aims that have little to do with the court’s purported status as an organ of the international community. Rather, the Supreme Court has appropriated international legal norms to pursue primarily domestic goals. This chapter proceeds as follows. Section II gives an overview of the status of international law in the Indian constitutional scheme. Section III analyzes the creative uses of international law by the Indian Supreme Court to fill in and add to the content of constitutional rights and guarantees, enabling its encroachment into domains that are normally the prerogative of the legislature and the executive. Section IV puts forward a possible explanation for this appropriation of international legal norms and suggests that international law has performed a legitimizing function in the Supreme Court’s articulation of its vision of the state.

KW - India

KW - India supreme court

KW - International law

KW - International legal norms

KW - Trans-judicial dialogue

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049548405&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85049548405&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/oso/9780190697570.003.0015

DO - 10.1093/oso/9780190697570.003.0015

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:85049548405

SP - 319

EP - 336

BT - Comparative International Law

PB - Oxford University Press

ER -