The clinical and economic effects of targeted bowel preparation: Results of a decision analysis

Jacob E. Kurlander, Shahnaz Sultan, Sameer D. Saini

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

Background: Colonoscopy bowel preparation failure is common, costly, and clinically harmful. Prediction models can identify patients at high risk for preparation failure, but they are rarely used. Goals: To investigate the clinical and economic effects of using a more intensive preparation upfront (a "targeted" strategy) for patients identified as high risk for preparation failure. Study: We developed a Markov decision analytic model to compare usual care with a targeted strategy. Usual care consisted of a 4 L preparation, followed by a 2-day preparation in the event of preparation failure. The targeted strategy consisted of a 4 L preparation for low-risk patients, and upfront 2 days preparation for high-risk patients. Base-case values were gathered from literature review. Under each strategy, we calculated days spent preparing for, or undergoing, colonoscopy (patient burden), and cost per patient (payer perspective). Sensitivity analyses were performed. Results: In the base case, the targeted strategy resulted in a similar patient burden compared with usual care (2.56 vs. 2.51 d, respectively). However, it substantially reduced cost per patient ($1254 vs. $1343) by reducing the number of colonoscopies. In sensitivity analyses, the targeted strategy reduced cost across the entire plausible range of risk of preparation failure and prediction model sensitivity and specificity. The targeted strategy resulted in less patient burden than usual care when (1) preparation failure risk exceeded 20%; (2) prediction sensitivity exceeded 73%; or (3) prediction specificity exceeded 76%. Conclusions: Targeted bowel preparation is likely to reduce costs associated with repeat colonoscopy with minimal effect on patient burden.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)853-858
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of clinical gastroenterology
Volume52
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2018

Fingerprint

Decision Support Techniques
Economics
Colonoscopy
Costs and Cost Analysis
Sensitivity and Specificity

Keywords

  • colonoscopy
  • personalized medicine
  • prep
  • preparation

Cite this

The clinical and economic effects of targeted bowel preparation : Results of a decision analysis. / Kurlander, Jacob E.; Sultan, Shahnaz; Saini, Sameer D.

In: Journal of clinical gastroenterology, Vol. 52, No. 10, 01.11.2018, p. 853-858.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{b6ee3d297c824ef181811a84c2e73140,
title = "The clinical and economic effects of targeted bowel preparation: Results of a decision analysis",
abstract = "Background: Colonoscopy bowel preparation failure is common, costly, and clinically harmful. Prediction models can identify patients at high risk for preparation failure, but they are rarely used. Goals: To investigate the clinical and economic effects of using a more intensive preparation upfront (a {"}targeted{"} strategy) for patients identified as high risk for preparation failure. Study: We developed a Markov decision analytic model to compare usual care with a targeted strategy. Usual care consisted of a 4 L preparation, followed by a 2-day preparation in the event of preparation failure. The targeted strategy consisted of a 4 L preparation for low-risk patients, and upfront 2 days preparation for high-risk patients. Base-case values were gathered from literature review. Under each strategy, we calculated days spent preparing for, or undergoing, colonoscopy (patient burden), and cost per patient (payer perspective). Sensitivity analyses were performed. Results: In the base case, the targeted strategy resulted in a similar patient burden compared with usual care (2.56 vs. 2.51 d, respectively). However, it substantially reduced cost per patient ($1254 vs. $1343) by reducing the number of colonoscopies. In sensitivity analyses, the targeted strategy reduced cost across the entire plausible range of risk of preparation failure and prediction model sensitivity and specificity. The targeted strategy resulted in less patient burden than usual care when (1) preparation failure risk exceeded 20{\%}; (2) prediction sensitivity exceeded 73{\%}; or (3) prediction specificity exceeded 76{\%}. Conclusions: Targeted bowel preparation is likely to reduce costs associated with repeat colonoscopy with minimal effect on patient burden.",
keywords = "colonoscopy, personalized medicine, prep, preparation",
author = "Kurlander, {Jacob E.} and Shahnaz Sultan and Saini, {Sameer D.}",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/MCG.0000000000000845",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "52",
pages = "853--858",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology",
issn = "0192-0790",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The clinical and economic effects of targeted bowel preparation

T2 - Results of a decision analysis

AU - Kurlander, Jacob E.

AU - Sultan, Shahnaz

AU - Saini, Sameer D.

PY - 2018/11/1

Y1 - 2018/11/1

N2 - Background: Colonoscopy bowel preparation failure is common, costly, and clinically harmful. Prediction models can identify patients at high risk for preparation failure, but they are rarely used. Goals: To investigate the clinical and economic effects of using a more intensive preparation upfront (a "targeted" strategy) for patients identified as high risk for preparation failure. Study: We developed a Markov decision analytic model to compare usual care with a targeted strategy. Usual care consisted of a 4 L preparation, followed by a 2-day preparation in the event of preparation failure. The targeted strategy consisted of a 4 L preparation for low-risk patients, and upfront 2 days preparation for high-risk patients. Base-case values were gathered from literature review. Under each strategy, we calculated days spent preparing for, or undergoing, colonoscopy (patient burden), and cost per patient (payer perspective). Sensitivity analyses were performed. Results: In the base case, the targeted strategy resulted in a similar patient burden compared with usual care (2.56 vs. 2.51 d, respectively). However, it substantially reduced cost per patient ($1254 vs. $1343) by reducing the number of colonoscopies. In sensitivity analyses, the targeted strategy reduced cost across the entire plausible range of risk of preparation failure and prediction model sensitivity and specificity. The targeted strategy resulted in less patient burden than usual care when (1) preparation failure risk exceeded 20%; (2) prediction sensitivity exceeded 73%; or (3) prediction specificity exceeded 76%. Conclusions: Targeted bowel preparation is likely to reduce costs associated with repeat colonoscopy with minimal effect on patient burden.

AB - Background: Colonoscopy bowel preparation failure is common, costly, and clinically harmful. Prediction models can identify patients at high risk for preparation failure, but they are rarely used. Goals: To investigate the clinical and economic effects of using a more intensive preparation upfront (a "targeted" strategy) for patients identified as high risk for preparation failure. Study: We developed a Markov decision analytic model to compare usual care with a targeted strategy. Usual care consisted of a 4 L preparation, followed by a 2-day preparation in the event of preparation failure. The targeted strategy consisted of a 4 L preparation for low-risk patients, and upfront 2 days preparation for high-risk patients. Base-case values were gathered from literature review. Under each strategy, we calculated days spent preparing for, or undergoing, colonoscopy (patient burden), and cost per patient (payer perspective). Sensitivity analyses were performed. Results: In the base case, the targeted strategy resulted in a similar patient burden compared with usual care (2.56 vs. 2.51 d, respectively). However, it substantially reduced cost per patient ($1254 vs. $1343) by reducing the number of colonoscopies. In sensitivity analyses, the targeted strategy reduced cost across the entire plausible range of risk of preparation failure and prediction model sensitivity and specificity. The targeted strategy resulted in less patient burden than usual care when (1) preparation failure risk exceeded 20%; (2) prediction sensitivity exceeded 73%; or (3) prediction specificity exceeded 76%. Conclusions: Targeted bowel preparation is likely to reduce costs associated with repeat colonoscopy with minimal effect on patient burden.

KW - colonoscopy

KW - personalized medicine

KW - prep

KW - preparation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85025130445&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85025130445&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000845

DO - 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000845

M3 - Review article

C2 - 28723857

AN - SCOPUS:85025130445

VL - 52

SP - 853

EP - 858

JO - Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology

JF - Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology

SN - 0192-0790

IS - 10

ER -