TY - JOUR
T1 - The Circle Nephrostomy Tube
T2 - An Attractive Nephrostomy Drainage System Following Complex Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
AU - El Tayeb, Marawan M.
AU - Borofsky, Michael S.
AU - Lingeman, James E.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2017/5
Y1 - 2017/5
N2 - Objective To describe our experience with the circle nephrostomy tube (NT) (Cook Medical), a drainage system uniquely designed for use after multiple-access percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL). Methods A retrospective review of 1317 consecutive patients undergoing 1599 PNLs at IU Health Methodist Hospital was performed. All multiple access cases utilizing circle NTs were reviewed and analyzed. The method of insertion of circle NT was demonstrated. Results A total of 1843 accesses were obtained in 1599 renal units (RUs): 380 upper pole, 129 interpolar, and 1334 lower pole. Multiple accesses in this series were required in 282 RUs (17.6%). Following multiple-access PNL, circle NTs, Cope loop, and reentry Malecot NTs were inserted in 91 RUs (32.3%), 208 RUs (73.8%), and 31 RUs (11%), respectively. None of the patients who had circle NT experienced clogging, dislodgement, or obstruction of the tube. The cost of circle, Cope loop, and Malecot NTs are 121.73 USD, 95.20 USD, and 81 USD, respectively. Conclusion Circle NTs are easy to insert, secure, cost-effective compared with inserting two NTs. Circle NTs provide excellent drainage and facilitate secondary procedures.
AB - Objective To describe our experience with the circle nephrostomy tube (NT) (Cook Medical), a drainage system uniquely designed for use after multiple-access percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL). Methods A retrospective review of 1317 consecutive patients undergoing 1599 PNLs at IU Health Methodist Hospital was performed. All multiple access cases utilizing circle NTs were reviewed and analyzed. The method of insertion of circle NT was demonstrated. Results A total of 1843 accesses were obtained in 1599 renal units (RUs): 380 upper pole, 129 interpolar, and 1334 lower pole. Multiple accesses in this series were required in 282 RUs (17.6%). Following multiple-access PNL, circle NTs, Cope loop, and reentry Malecot NTs were inserted in 91 RUs (32.3%), 208 RUs (73.8%), and 31 RUs (11%), respectively. None of the patients who had circle NT experienced clogging, dislodgement, or obstruction of the tube. The cost of circle, Cope loop, and Malecot NTs are 121.73 USD, 95.20 USD, and 81 USD, respectively. Conclusion Circle NTs are easy to insert, secure, cost-effective compared with inserting two NTs. Circle NTs provide excellent drainage and facilitate secondary procedures.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85013387710&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85013387710&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.urology.2017.01.012
DO - 10.1016/j.urology.2017.01.012
M3 - Article
C2 - 28108324
AN - SCOPUS:85013387710
SN - 0090-4295
VL - 103
SP - 251
EP - 255
JO - Urology
JF - Urology
ER -