The Blue Check of Credibility: Does Account Verification Matter When Evaluating News on Twitter

Stephanie Edgerly, Emily K. Vraga

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The increased reliance on social network sites for news and the proliferation of partisan news have refocused scholarly attention on how people judge credibility online. Twitter has faced scrutiny regarding their practices in assigning the "verified" status to Twitter accounts, but little work has investigated whether users apply this cue in making assessments for information quality. Using an experimental design, we test whether the Twitter verification mark contributes to perceptions of information and account credibility among news organizations. We additionally consider how account ambiguity and account congruence with political beliefs condition this relationship. Our results suggest little attention is paid to the verification mark when judging credibility, even when little other information is provided about the account or the content. Instead, account ambiguity and congruence dominate credibility assessments of news organizations. We propose that Twitter may need to revise their verification badges to increase their salience or provide more information to users. Currently, users appear to rely on other cues than the verification label when judging information quality.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)283-287
Number of pages5
JournalCyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking
Volume22
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2019

Fingerprint

twitter
credibility
Cues
news
Organizations
Social Support
Research Design
Design of experiments
Labels
proliferation
social network

Keywords

  • credibility
  • partisan news
  • social media
  • Twitter

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Journal Article

Cite this

The Blue Check of Credibility : Does Account Verification Matter When Evaluating News on Twitter. / Edgerly, Stephanie; Vraga, Emily K.

In: Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, Vol. 22, No. 4, 01.04.2019, p. 283-287.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9507a65800934a03ba0b7a8083f1b5be,
title = "The Blue Check of Credibility: Does Account Verification Matter When Evaluating News on Twitter",
abstract = "The increased reliance on social network sites for news and the proliferation of partisan news have refocused scholarly attention on how people judge credibility online. Twitter has faced scrutiny regarding their practices in assigning the {"}verified{"} status to Twitter accounts, but little work has investigated whether users apply this cue in making assessments for information quality. Using an experimental design, we test whether the Twitter verification mark contributes to perceptions of information and account credibility among news organizations. We additionally consider how account ambiguity and account congruence with political beliefs condition this relationship. Our results suggest little attention is paid to the verification mark when judging credibility, even when little other information is provided about the account or the content. Instead, account ambiguity and congruence dominate credibility assessments of news organizations. We propose that Twitter may need to revise their verification badges to increase their salience or provide more information to users. Currently, users appear to rely on other cues than the verification label when judging information quality.",
keywords = "credibility, partisan news, social media, Twitter",
author = "Stephanie Edgerly and Vraga, {Emily K.}",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1089/cyber.2018.0475",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "283--287",
journal = "Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking",
issn = "2152-2715",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Blue Check of Credibility

T2 - Does Account Verification Matter When Evaluating News on Twitter

AU - Edgerly, Stephanie

AU - Vraga, Emily K.

PY - 2019/4/1

Y1 - 2019/4/1

N2 - The increased reliance on social network sites for news and the proliferation of partisan news have refocused scholarly attention on how people judge credibility online. Twitter has faced scrutiny regarding their practices in assigning the "verified" status to Twitter accounts, but little work has investigated whether users apply this cue in making assessments for information quality. Using an experimental design, we test whether the Twitter verification mark contributes to perceptions of information and account credibility among news organizations. We additionally consider how account ambiguity and account congruence with political beliefs condition this relationship. Our results suggest little attention is paid to the verification mark when judging credibility, even when little other information is provided about the account or the content. Instead, account ambiguity and congruence dominate credibility assessments of news organizations. We propose that Twitter may need to revise their verification badges to increase their salience or provide more information to users. Currently, users appear to rely on other cues than the verification label when judging information quality.

AB - The increased reliance on social network sites for news and the proliferation of partisan news have refocused scholarly attention on how people judge credibility online. Twitter has faced scrutiny regarding their practices in assigning the "verified" status to Twitter accounts, but little work has investigated whether users apply this cue in making assessments for information quality. Using an experimental design, we test whether the Twitter verification mark contributes to perceptions of information and account credibility among news organizations. We additionally consider how account ambiguity and account congruence with political beliefs condition this relationship. Our results suggest little attention is paid to the verification mark when judging credibility, even when little other information is provided about the account or the content. Instead, account ambiguity and congruence dominate credibility assessments of news organizations. We propose that Twitter may need to revise their verification badges to increase their salience or provide more information to users. Currently, users appear to rely on other cues than the verification label when judging information quality.

KW - credibility

KW - partisan news

KW - social media

KW - Twitter

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064153102&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85064153102&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1089/cyber.2018.0475

DO - 10.1089/cyber.2018.0475

M3 - Article

C2 - 30848675

AN - SCOPUS:85064153102

VL - 22

SP - 283

EP - 287

JO - Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking

JF - Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking

SN - 2152-2715

IS - 4

ER -