The benefits of defining “snacks”

Julie M. Hess, Joanne L Slavin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Whether eating a “snack” is considered a beneficial or detrimental behavior is largely based on how “snack” is defined. The term “snack food” tends to connote energy-dense, nutrient-poor foods high in nutrients to limit (sugar, sodium, and/or saturated fat) like cakes, cookies, chips and other salty snacks, and sugar-sweetened beverages. Eating a “snack food” is often conflated with eating a “snack,” however, leading to an overall perception of snacks as a dietary negative. Yet the term “snack” can also refer simply to an eating occasion outside of breakfast, lunch, or dinner. With this definition, the evidence to support health benefits or detriments to eating a “snack” remains unclear, in part because relatively few well-designed studies that specifically focus on the impact of eating frequency on health have been conducted. Despite these inconsistencies and research gaps, in much of the nutrition literature, “snacking” is still referred to as detrimental to health. As discussed in this review, however, there are multiple factors that influence the health impacts of snacking, including the definition of “snack” itself, the motivation to snack, body mass index of snack eaters, and the food selected as a snack. Without a definition of “snack” and a body of research using methodologically rigorous protocols, determining the health impact of eating a “snack” will continue to elude the nutrition research community and prevent the development of evidence-based policies about snacking that support public health.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)284-287
Number of pages4
JournalPhysiology and Behavior
Volume193
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2018

Fingerprint

Snacks
Eating
Health
Food
Research
Social Planning
Lunch
Breakfast
Beverages

Keywords

  • Eating behavior
  • Nutrient density
  • Nutritional assessment
  • Snacks

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Journal Article
  • Review

Cite this

The benefits of defining “snacks”. / Hess, Julie M.; Slavin, Joanne L.

In: Physiology and Behavior, Vol. 193, 01.09.2018, p. 284-287.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hess, Julie M. ; Slavin, Joanne L. / The benefits of defining “snacks”. In: Physiology and Behavior. 2018 ; Vol. 193. pp. 284-287.
@article{7e5642005356433aa33a93d49cae1614,
title = "The benefits of defining “snacks”",
abstract = "Whether eating a “snack” is considered a beneficial or detrimental behavior is largely based on how “snack” is defined. The term “snack food” tends to connote energy-dense, nutrient-poor foods high in nutrients to limit (sugar, sodium, and/or saturated fat) like cakes, cookies, chips and other salty snacks, and sugar-sweetened beverages. Eating a “snack food” is often conflated with eating a “snack,” however, leading to an overall perception of snacks as a dietary negative. Yet the term “snack” can also refer simply to an eating occasion outside of breakfast, lunch, or dinner. With this definition, the evidence to support health benefits or detriments to eating a “snack” remains unclear, in part because relatively few well-designed studies that specifically focus on the impact of eating frequency on health have been conducted. Despite these inconsistencies and research gaps, in much of the nutrition literature, “snacking” is still referred to as detrimental to health. As discussed in this review, however, there are multiple factors that influence the health impacts of snacking, including the definition of “snack” itself, the motivation to snack, body mass index of snack eaters, and the food selected as a snack. Without a definition of “snack” and a body of research using methodologically rigorous protocols, determining the health impact of eating a “snack” will continue to elude the nutrition research community and prevent the development of evidence-based policies about snacking that support public health.",
keywords = "Eating behavior, Nutrient density, Nutritional assessment, Snacks",
author = "Hess, {Julie M.} and Slavin, {Joanne L}",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.physbeh.2018.04.019",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "193",
pages = "284--287",
journal = "Physiology and Behavior",
issn = "0031-9384",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The benefits of defining “snacks”

AU - Hess, Julie M.

AU - Slavin, Joanne L

PY - 2018/9/1

Y1 - 2018/9/1

N2 - Whether eating a “snack” is considered a beneficial or detrimental behavior is largely based on how “snack” is defined. The term “snack food” tends to connote energy-dense, nutrient-poor foods high in nutrients to limit (sugar, sodium, and/or saturated fat) like cakes, cookies, chips and other salty snacks, and sugar-sweetened beverages. Eating a “snack food” is often conflated with eating a “snack,” however, leading to an overall perception of snacks as a dietary negative. Yet the term “snack” can also refer simply to an eating occasion outside of breakfast, lunch, or dinner. With this definition, the evidence to support health benefits or detriments to eating a “snack” remains unclear, in part because relatively few well-designed studies that specifically focus on the impact of eating frequency on health have been conducted. Despite these inconsistencies and research gaps, in much of the nutrition literature, “snacking” is still referred to as detrimental to health. As discussed in this review, however, there are multiple factors that influence the health impacts of snacking, including the definition of “snack” itself, the motivation to snack, body mass index of snack eaters, and the food selected as a snack. Without a definition of “snack” and a body of research using methodologically rigorous protocols, determining the health impact of eating a “snack” will continue to elude the nutrition research community and prevent the development of evidence-based policies about snacking that support public health.

AB - Whether eating a “snack” is considered a beneficial or detrimental behavior is largely based on how “snack” is defined. The term “snack food” tends to connote energy-dense, nutrient-poor foods high in nutrients to limit (sugar, sodium, and/or saturated fat) like cakes, cookies, chips and other salty snacks, and sugar-sweetened beverages. Eating a “snack food” is often conflated with eating a “snack,” however, leading to an overall perception of snacks as a dietary negative. Yet the term “snack” can also refer simply to an eating occasion outside of breakfast, lunch, or dinner. With this definition, the evidence to support health benefits or detriments to eating a “snack” remains unclear, in part because relatively few well-designed studies that specifically focus on the impact of eating frequency on health have been conducted. Despite these inconsistencies and research gaps, in much of the nutrition literature, “snacking” is still referred to as detrimental to health. As discussed in this review, however, there are multiple factors that influence the health impacts of snacking, including the definition of “snack” itself, the motivation to snack, body mass index of snack eaters, and the food selected as a snack. Without a definition of “snack” and a body of research using methodologically rigorous protocols, determining the health impact of eating a “snack” will continue to elude the nutrition research community and prevent the development of evidence-based policies about snacking that support public health.

KW - Eating behavior

KW - Nutrient density

KW - Nutritional assessment

KW - Snacks

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046120079&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85046120079&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.physbeh.2018.04.019

DO - 10.1016/j.physbeh.2018.04.019

M3 - Article

C2 - 29678598

AN - SCOPUS:85046120079

VL - 193

SP - 284

EP - 287

JO - Physiology and Behavior

JF - Physiology and Behavior

SN - 0031-9384

ER -