Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The Artificial Urinary Sphincter Clinical Outcomes Trial: Primary Results

  • Melissa R. Kaufman
  • , Hadley M. Wood
  • , Ryan Terlecki
  • , Daniel Moon
  • , Jeremy Myers
  • , Alex J. Vanni
  • , Le Roy Jones
  • , Joshua A. Broghammer
  • , Gerard Henry
  • , Benjamin N. Breyer
  • , Bradley Erickson
  • , Arthur L. Burnett
  • , Niels V. Johnsen
  • , Lewis Wen Loong Chan
  • , Brian J. Flynn
  • , Rose Khavari
  • , Thomas G. Smith
  • , Sean Elliott
  • , Erin L. Chaussee
  • , Kaitlyn Rainbow
  • Andrew C. Peterson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: – The artificial urinary sphincter endures as the standard of care treatment for mild to severe male stress urinary incontinence. Prior studies report outcomes from predominantly single-center retrospective series. Herein we present data from a multi-institutional analysis of artificial urinary sphincter outcomes (AUSCO) to assess efficacy, safety, and quality of life to standardize result reporting.Materials and Methods: – AUSCO is a single-arm, prospective, multi-center study designed to evaluate the AMS 800™ in men with primary stress urinary incontinence (NCT04088331). One hundred fifteen participants were implanted at 17 sites. The primary endpoint was > 50% improvement in 24-hour pad weight 12 months post device activation. Secondary endpoints including pad use, urinary incontinence events per day, quality of life and device satisfaction were measured between 3- and 12- months post device activation and compared to baseline.Results: – At 12 months, 94% (91/97) participants experienced >50% pad weight reduction (p<0.001) and 60% (61/101) reported zero pad use. Participants also reported substantial improvement in quality of life scores and incontinence events per day post device activation. Seventeen participants (15%) had serious adverse events, 10 (8.7%) in which the events were device related. Nine participants (7.8%) had revisions: mechanical malfunction (3), erosion (2), lack of efficacy (1), other (3), and zero due to infection.Conclusions: – In this prospective trial, the artificial urinary sphincter allowed most men to achieve total continence with a serious adverse event rate less than 15%. Participants experienced significant continence recovery with transformational improvement in patient-reported outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-24
Number of pages24
JournalJournal of Urology
VolumePublish Ahead of Print
DOIs
StatePublished - 2026

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s). Published on behalf of the American Urological Association, Education and Research, Inc.

Keywords

  • Artificial;
  • Quality of Life
  • Stress;
  • Urinary Incontinence
  • Urinary Sphincter

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Journal Article
  • Multicenter Study
  • Observational Study

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Artificial Urinary Sphincter Clinical Outcomes Trial: Primary Results'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this