TY - JOUR
T1 - The anthropology of potentiality in biomedicine
T2 - An introduction to supplement 7
AU - Taussig, Karen Sue
AU - Hoeyer, Klaus
AU - Helmreich, Stefan
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2013 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2013/10
Y1 - 2013/10
N2 - At the beginning of the twenty-first century, potentiality serves as a central concept in the life sciences and in medical practices. This special issue of Current Anthropology explores how genes, cells, bodies, and populations as well as technologies, disciplines, and research areas become imbued with potential. We suggest that anthropologists of the life sciences and biomedicine should work reflexively with the concept of potentiality and the politics of its naming and framing. We lay out a set of propositions and emphasize the moral aspects of claims about potentiality as well as the productivity of the ambiguity involved when dealing with that which does not (yet and may never) exist. We suggest that potentiality is both an analytic-one that has appeared explicitly and tacitly in the history of anthropology-as well as an object of study in need of further attention. To understand contemporary meanings and practices associated with potentiality, we must integrate an awareness of our own social scientific assumptions about potentiality with critical scrutiny of how the word and concept operate in the lives of the people we study.
AB - At the beginning of the twenty-first century, potentiality serves as a central concept in the life sciences and in medical practices. This special issue of Current Anthropology explores how genes, cells, bodies, and populations as well as technologies, disciplines, and research areas become imbued with potential. We suggest that anthropologists of the life sciences and biomedicine should work reflexively with the concept of potentiality and the politics of its naming and framing. We lay out a set of propositions and emphasize the moral aspects of claims about potentiality as well as the productivity of the ambiguity involved when dealing with that which does not (yet and may never) exist. We suggest that potentiality is both an analytic-one that has appeared explicitly and tacitly in the history of anthropology-as well as an object of study in need of further attention. To understand contemporary meanings and practices associated with potentiality, we must integrate an awareness of our own social scientific assumptions about potentiality with critical scrutiny of how the word and concept operate in the lives of the people we study.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84884551147&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84884551147&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1086/671401
DO - 10.1086/671401
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84884551147
SN - 0011-3204
VL - 54
SP - S3-S14
JO - Current Anthropology
JF - Current Anthropology
IS - SUPPL.7
ER -