The age-21 minimum legal drinking age

A case study linking past and current debates

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The minimum legal drinking age (MLDA) in the United States (U.S.) has raised debate over the past several decades. During the 1970s many states lowered their MLDAs from age 21 to 18, 19, or 20. However, as a result of studies showing that these lower MLDAs were associated with increases in traffic crashes, state-level movements began in the later1970s to return MLDAs to age 21. A new movement has arisen to again lower the MLDA in the U.S. Aim: The aim is to discuss this current MLDA debate within the context of the long history of the U.S. MLDA. Methods: A search of research articles, websites, and newspaper articles was conducted to identify key messages and influences related to the MLDA movements. Results: The complexity of state movements to change their MLDAs is illustrated by the Michigan experience, where strong political forces on both sides of the issue were involved, resulting in the MLDA returning to 21. Because the 21st Constitutional amendment prevents the federal government from mandating a MLDA for all states, a federal policy was proposed to provide incentives for all states to implement age-21 MLDAs. Due largely to strong research evidence, the National Minimum Legal Drinking Age Act was enacted in 1984, stipulating that states set their MLDA to 21 or face loss of federal highway funds. By 1988, all states had an age-21 MLDA. Conclusion: Any current debate about the MLDA should be informed by the historical context of this policy and the available research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1958-1965
Number of pages8
JournalAddiction
Volume104
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2009

Fingerprint

Underage Drinking
Research
Federal Government
Newspapers
Financial Management
Legislation
Motivation
History

Keywords

  • Alcohol
  • Legal drinking age
  • Minors
  • Policy
  • Social movements
  • Underage

Cite this

The age-21 minimum legal drinking age : A case study linking past and current debates. / Toomey, Traci L.; Nelson, Toben F.; Lenk, Kathleen M.

In: Addiction, Vol. 104, No. 12, 01.12.2009, p. 1958-1965.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{890cc2a29b36424095212cedfb62343a,
title = "The age-21 minimum legal drinking age: A case study linking past and current debates",
abstract = "Background: The minimum legal drinking age (MLDA) in the United States (U.S.) has raised debate over the past several decades. During the 1970s many states lowered their MLDAs from age 21 to 18, 19, or 20. However, as a result of studies showing that these lower MLDAs were associated with increases in traffic crashes, state-level movements began in the later1970s to return MLDAs to age 21. A new movement has arisen to again lower the MLDA in the U.S. Aim: The aim is to discuss this current MLDA debate within the context of the long history of the U.S. MLDA. Methods: A search of research articles, websites, and newspaper articles was conducted to identify key messages and influences related to the MLDA movements. Results: The complexity of state movements to change their MLDAs is illustrated by the Michigan experience, where strong political forces on both sides of the issue were involved, resulting in the MLDA returning to 21. Because the 21st Constitutional amendment prevents the federal government from mandating a MLDA for all states, a federal policy was proposed to provide incentives for all states to implement age-21 MLDAs. Due largely to strong research evidence, the National Minimum Legal Drinking Age Act was enacted in 1984, stipulating that states set their MLDA to 21 or face loss of federal highway funds. By 1988, all states had an age-21 MLDA. Conclusion: Any current debate about the MLDA should be informed by the historical context of this policy and the available research.",
keywords = "Alcohol, Legal drinking age, Minors, Policy, Social movements, Underage",
author = "Toomey, {Traci L.} and Nelson, {Toben F.} and Lenk, {Kathleen M.}",
year = "2009",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02742.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "104",
pages = "1958--1965",
journal = "Addiction",
issn = "0965-2140",
publisher = "Blackwell Publishing Ltd",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The age-21 minimum legal drinking age

T2 - A case study linking past and current debates

AU - Toomey, Traci L.

AU - Nelson, Toben F.

AU - Lenk, Kathleen M.

PY - 2009/12/1

Y1 - 2009/12/1

N2 - Background: The minimum legal drinking age (MLDA) in the United States (U.S.) has raised debate over the past several decades. During the 1970s many states lowered their MLDAs from age 21 to 18, 19, or 20. However, as a result of studies showing that these lower MLDAs were associated with increases in traffic crashes, state-level movements began in the later1970s to return MLDAs to age 21. A new movement has arisen to again lower the MLDA in the U.S. Aim: The aim is to discuss this current MLDA debate within the context of the long history of the U.S. MLDA. Methods: A search of research articles, websites, and newspaper articles was conducted to identify key messages and influences related to the MLDA movements. Results: The complexity of state movements to change their MLDAs is illustrated by the Michigan experience, where strong political forces on both sides of the issue were involved, resulting in the MLDA returning to 21. Because the 21st Constitutional amendment prevents the federal government from mandating a MLDA for all states, a federal policy was proposed to provide incentives for all states to implement age-21 MLDAs. Due largely to strong research evidence, the National Minimum Legal Drinking Age Act was enacted in 1984, stipulating that states set their MLDA to 21 or face loss of federal highway funds. By 1988, all states had an age-21 MLDA. Conclusion: Any current debate about the MLDA should be informed by the historical context of this policy and the available research.

AB - Background: The minimum legal drinking age (MLDA) in the United States (U.S.) has raised debate over the past several decades. During the 1970s many states lowered their MLDAs from age 21 to 18, 19, or 20. However, as a result of studies showing that these lower MLDAs were associated with increases in traffic crashes, state-level movements began in the later1970s to return MLDAs to age 21. A new movement has arisen to again lower the MLDA in the U.S. Aim: The aim is to discuss this current MLDA debate within the context of the long history of the U.S. MLDA. Methods: A search of research articles, websites, and newspaper articles was conducted to identify key messages and influences related to the MLDA movements. Results: The complexity of state movements to change their MLDAs is illustrated by the Michigan experience, where strong political forces on both sides of the issue were involved, resulting in the MLDA returning to 21. Because the 21st Constitutional amendment prevents the federal government from mandating a MLDA for all states, a federal policy was proposed to provide incentives for all states to implement age-21 MLDAs. Due largely to strong research evidence, the National Minimum Legal Drinking Age Act was enacted in 1984, stipulating that states set their MLDA to 21 or face loss of federal highway funds. By 1988, all states had an age-21 MLDA. Conclusion: Any current debate about the MLDA should be informed by the historical context of this policy and the available research.

KW - Alcohol

KW - Legal drinking age

KW - Minors

KW - Policy

KW - Social movements

KW - Underage

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70449432781&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70449432781&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02742.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02742.x

M3 - Review article

VL - 104

SP - 1958

EP - 1965

JO - Addiction

JF - Addiction

SN - 0965-2140

IS - 12

ER -