TY - JOUR
T1 - The Accuracy of Portable Cholesterol Analyzers in Public Screening Programs
AU - Naughton, Michelle J.
AU - Luepker, Russell V
AU - Strickland, Daniel
PY - 1990/3/2
Y1 - 1990/3/2
N2 - To determine the accuracy of portable cholesterol analyzers in public settings, four screening organizations were accompanied to cholesterol screenings where consenting participants completed the finger-stick procedure and provided a blood sample by venipuncture. The finger-stick values were compared later with the participants’ blood cholesterol values obtained in a reference laboratory. The results indicated that only one of the organizations produced cholesterol measurements entirely within the acceptable range ( ± 14.2%), while the accuracy of the other three organizations ranged from 76.5% to 96.4%. Those finger-stick values that did not fall within the acceptable range tended to underestimate the laboratory cholesterol values. Additionally, classification of the persons screened based on the National Cholesterol Education Program risk categories indicated that the finger-stick values primarily tended to produce false-negative results. The variability of the results across organizations was caused partially by insufficient operator training. However, inadequate quality-control procedures for field settings and dilution of capillary blood by tissue fluid also may have contributed to the inaccurate finger-stick results.
AB - To determine the accuracy of portable cholesterol analyzers in public settings, four screening organizations were accompanied to cholesterol screenings where consenting participants completed the finger-stick procedure and provided a blood sample by venipuncture. The finger-stick values were compared later with the participants’ blood cholesterol values obtained in a reference laboratory. The results indicated that only one of the organizations produced cholesterol measurements entirely within the acceptable range ( ± 14.2%), while the accuracy of the other three organizations ranged from 76.5% to 96.4%. Those finger-stick values that did not fall within the acceptable range tended to underestimate the laboratory cholesterol values. Additionally, classification of the persons screened based on the National Cholesterol Education Program risk categories indicated that the finger-stick values primarily tended to produce false-negative results. The variability of the results across organizations was caused partially by insufficient operator training. However, inadequate quality-control procedures for field settings and dilution of capillary blood by tissue fluid also may have contributed to the inaccurate finger-stick results.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025008843&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025008843&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1001/jama.1990.03440090047024
DO - 10.1001/jama.1990.03440090047024
M3 - Article
C2 - 2304236
AN - SCOPUS:0025008843
SN - 0098-7484
VL - 263
SP - 1213
EP - 1217
JO - JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association
JF - JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association
IS - 9
ER -