Testing the Equality of Scale Values and Discriminal Dispersions in Paired Comparisons

Mark L Davison, Dennis P. Mcguire, Tsuey Hwa Chen, Ronald O. Anderson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

General normal ogive and logistic multiple-group models for paired comparisons data are described. In these models, scale value and discriminal dispersion parameters are allowed to vary across stimuli and re spondent populations. Submodels can be fit to choice proportions by nonlinearly regressing sample estimates of choice proportions onto a complex design matrix. By fitting various submodels and by appropriate coding of parameter effects, selected hypotheses about the equality of scale value and dispersion parameters across groups can be tested. Model fitting and hypothesis testing are illustrated using health care coverage data collected in two age groups.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)257-267
Number of pages11
JournalApplied Psychological Measurement
Volume19
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1995

Keywords

  • Bradley- Terry-Luce Model
  • Thurstone's Law of Com parative Judgment
  • choice models
  • logistic regression
  • paired com parisons
  • probit regression

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Testing the Equality of Scale Values and Discriminal Dispersions in Paired Comparisons'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this