Test discrimination, job performance and age

R. D. Arvey, S. J. Mussio

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Because companies have come to rely a great deal on psychological tests to select employees, the authors investigated the possibility of unfair test discrimination against older individuals. They conducted a validation study to relate job performance and test scores on a sample of 266 female civil service clerical workers in a large midwestern city. 34% of this sample were 24 yr or under (younger group); 35% were 50 yr or over (older group). Job performance was measured by supervisory ratings of the employees' overall job effectiveness, and test performance was gauged by a series of psychological tests. The analyses revealed that the younger group did significantly better on 3 of the 5 tests and the older group better on 2. But there was no difference when the two groups were evaluated on job performance. These results indicate that if any of the tests were used for selection purposes without considering the applicant's age, unfair test discrimination would occur.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)22-29
Number of pages8
JournalIndustrial Gerontology
VolumeNo. 16
StatePublished - Jan 1 1973

Fingerprint

Psychological Tests
Validation Studies
Work Performance

Cite this

Arvey, R. D., & Mussio, S. J. (1973). Test discrimination, job performance and age. Industrial Gerontology, No. 16, 22-29.

Test discrimination, job performance and age. / Arvey, R. D.; Mussio, S. J.

In: Industrial Gerontology, Vol. No. 16, 01.01.1973, p. 22-29.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Arvey, RD & Mussio, SJ 1973, 'Test discrimination, job performance and age' Industrial Gerontology, vol. No. 16, pp. 22-29.
Arvey RD, Mussio SJ. Test discrimination, job performance and age. Industrial Gerontology. 1973 Jan 1;No. 16:22-29.
Arvey, R. D. ; Mussio, S. J. / Test discrimination, job performance and age. In: Industrial Gerontology. 1973 ; Vol. No. 16. pp. 22-29.
@article{7928b6fe25f84f42bbe87f7979d86af1,
title = "Test discrimination, job performance and age",
abstract = "Because companies have come to rely a great deal on psychological tests to select employees, the authors investigated the possibility of unfair test discrimination against older individuals. They conducted a validation study to relate job performance and test scores on a sample of 266 female civil service clerical workers in a large midwestern city. 34{\%} of this sample were 24 yr or under (younger group); 35{\%} were 50 yr or over (older group). Job performance was measured by supervisory ratings of the employees' overall job effectiveness, and test performance was gauged by a series of psychological tests. The analyses revealed that the younger group did significantly better on 3 of the 5 tests and the older group better on 2. But there was no difference when the two groups were evaluated on job performance. These results indicate that if any of the tests were used for selection purposes without considering the applicant's age, unfair test discrimination would occur.",
author = "Arvey, {R. D.} and Mussio, {S. J.}",
year = "1973",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "No. 16",
pages = "22--29",
journal = "Industrial Gerontology",
issn = "0019-8358",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Test discrimination, job performance and age

AU - Arvey, R. D.

AU - Mussio, S. J.

PY - 1973/1/1

Y1 - 1973/1/1

N2 - Because companies have come to rely a great deal on psychological tests to select employees, the authors investigated the possibility of unfair test discrimination against older individuals. They conducted a validation study to relate job performance and test scores on a sample of 266 female civil service clerical workers in a large midwestern city. 34% of this sample were 24 yr or under (younger group); 35% were 50 yr or over (older group). Job performance was measured by supervisory ratings of the employees' overall job effectiveness, and test performance was gauged by a series of psychological tests. The analyses revealed that the younger group did significantly better on 3 of the 5 tests and the older group better on 2. But there was no difference when the two groups were evaluated on job performance. These results indicate that if any of the tests were used for selection purposes without considering the applicant's age, unfair test discrimination would occur.

AB - Because companies have come to rely a great deal on psychological tests to select employees, the authors investigated the possibility of unfair test discrimination against older individuals. They conducted a validation study to relate job performance and test scores on a sample of 266 female civil service clerical workers in a large midwestern city. 34% of this sample were 24 yr or under (younger group); 35% were 50 yr or over (older group). Job performance was measured by supervisory ratings of the employees' overall job effectiveness, and test performance was gauged by a series of psychological tests. The analyses revealed that the younger group did significantly better on 3 of the 5 tests and the older group better on 2. But there was no difference when the two groups were evaluated on job performance. These results indicate that if any of the tests were used for selection purposes without considering the applicant's age, unfair test discrimination would occur.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0015884863&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0015884863&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - No. 16

SP - 22

EP - 29

JO - Industrial Gerontology

JF - Industrial Gerontology

SN - 0019-8358

ER -