Temporal reflexivity in journalism studies: Making sense of change in a more timely fashion

Matt Carlson, Seth C. Lewis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Journalism studies is a relatively young field trying to make sense of a relatively fast-moving scholarly object – news. The matter of time is emerging as a particularly vexing challenge: When so much seems to be changing, and so quickly, how are journalism studies researchers to discern meaningful developments as opposed to short-term ephemera? This essay argues for ‘temporal reflexivity’, a way of fostering critical judgment about whether some phenomenon is indeed a break from what came before, a continuation of what has existed, or some middle-ground mutation. Such thinking reveals how temporality is embedded within journalism studies, driving assumptions and incentives about how and what to research – as well as what not to research. In particular, we apply the lens of temporal reflexivity to discuss issues of time and attention across three key areas of concern for journalism studies’ development as a field: first, the need for an analytical approach that balances change and stasis; second, the need to address issues of scale in which it is difficult to discern passing fads from deeper shifts that may lead to new institutional forms; and third, the need to understand the complicated and circular role of journalism education, both in reinforcing discourses of ‘crisis’ and ‘innovation’ and in lending stability to the boundaries of journalism as professionalized practice. In all, this essay opens up ways of considering the taken-for-granted temporal implications of research questions and pedagogical practices in journalism studies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)642-650
Number of pages9
JournalJournalism
Volume20
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2019

Fingerprint

reflexivity
journalism
Lenses
Innovation
Education
Ministry of State Security (GDR)
Reflexivity
Sensemaking
Journalism
lending
news
incentive
innovation
discourse
education

Keywords

  • Change
  • digital journalism
  • journalism education
  • journalism studies
  • news innovation
  • technology
  • temporal reflexivity
  • time

Cite this

Temporal reflexivity in journalism studies : Making sense of change in a more timely fashion. / Carlson, Matt; Lewis, Seth C.

In: Journalism, Vol. 20, No. 5, 01.05.2019, p. 642-650.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{718e62e510f74003af4c7c67c79105e3,
title = "Temporal reflexivity in journalism studies: Making sense of change in a more timely fashion",
abstract = "Journalism studies is a relatively young field trying to make sense of a relatively fast-moving scholarly object – news. The matter of time is emerging as a particularly vexing challenge: When so much seems to be changing, and so quickly, how are journalism studies researchers to discern meaningful developments as opposed to short-term ephemera? This essay argues for ‘temporal reflexivity’, a way of fostering critical judgment about whether some phenomenon is indeed a break from what came before, a continuation of what has existed, or some middle-ground mutation. Such thinking reveals how temporality is embedded within journalism studies, driving assumptions and incentives about how and what to research – as well as what not to research. In particular, we apply the lens of temporal reflexivity to discuss issues of time and attention across three key areas of concern for journalism studies’ development as a field: first, the need for an analytical approach that balances change and stasis; second, the need to address issues of scale in which it is difficult to discern passing fads from deeper shifts that may lead to new institutional forms; and third, the need to understand the complicated and circular role of journalism education, both in reinforcing discourses of ‘crisis’ and ‘innovation’ and in lending stability to the boundaries of journalism as professionalized practice. In all, this essay opens up ways of considering the taken-for-granted temporal implications of research questions and pedagogical practices in journalism studies.",
keywords = "Change, digital journalism, journalism education, journalism studies, news innovation, technology, temporal reflexivity, time",
author = "Matt Carlson and Lewis, {Seth C.}",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1464884918760675",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "642--650",
journal = "Journalism",
issn = "1464-8849",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Temporal reflexivity in journalism studies

T2 - Making sense of change in a more timely fashion

AU - Carlson, Matt

AU - Lewis, Seth C.

PY - 2019/5/1

Y1 - 2019/5/1

N2 - Journalism studies is a relatively young field trying to make sense of a relatively fast-moving scholarly object – news. The matter of time is emerging as a particularly vexing challenge: When so much seems to be changing, and so quickly, how are journalism studies researchers to discern meaningful developments as opposed to short-term ephemera? This essay argues for ‘temporal reflexivity’, a way of fostering critical judgment about whether some phenomenon is indeed a break from what came before, a continuation of what has existed, or some middle-ground mutation. Such thinking reveals how temporality is embedded within journalism studies, driving assumptions and incentives about how and what to research – as well as what not to research. In particular, we apply the lens of temporal reflexivity to discuss issues of time and attention across three key areas of concern for journalism studies’ development as a field: first, the need for an analytical approach that balances change and stasis; second, the need to address issues of scale in which it is difficult to discern passing fads from deeper shifts that may lead to new institutional forms; and third, the need to understand the complicated and circular role of journalism education, both in reinforcing discourses of ‘crisis’ and ‘innovation’ and in lending stability to the boundaries of journalism as professionalized practice. In all, this essay opens up ways of considering the taken-for-granted temporal implications of research questions and pedagogical practices in journalism studies.

AB - Journalism studies is a relatively young field trying to make sense of a relatively fast-moving scholarly object – news. The matter of time is emerging as a particularly vexing challenge: When so much seems to be changing, and so quickly, how are journalism studies researchers to discern meaningful developments as opposed to short-term ephemera? This essay argues for ‘temporal reflexivity’, a way of fostering critical judgment about whether some phenomenon is indeed a break from what came before, a continuation of what has existed, or some middle-ground mutation. Such thinking reveals how temporality is embedded within journalism studies, driving assumptions and incentives about how and what to research – as well as what not to research. In particular, we apply the lens of temporal reflexivity to discuss issues of time and attention across three key areas of concern for journalism studies’ development as a field: first, the need for an analytical approach that balances change and stasis; second, the need to address issues of scale in which it is difficult to discern passing fads from deeper shifts that may lead to new institutional forms; and third, the need to understand the complicated and circular role of journalism education, both in reinforcing discourses of ‘crisis’ and ‘innovation’ and in lending stability to the boundaries of journalism as professionalized practice. In all, this essay opens up ways of considering the taken-for-granted temporal implications of research questions and pedagogical practices in journalism studies.

KW - Change

KW - digital journalism

KW - journalism education

KW - journalism studies

KW - news innovation

KW - technology

KW - temporal reflexivity

KW - time

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044036972&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85044036972&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1464884918760675

DO - 10.1177/1464884918760675

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85044036972

VL - 20

SP - 642

EP - 650

JO - Journalism

JF - Journalism

SN - 1464-8849

IS - 5

ER -