Skip to main navigation
Skip to search
Skip to main content
Experts@Minnesota Home
Home
Profiles
Research units
University Assets
Projects and Grants
Research output
Datasets
Press/Media
Activities
Fellowships, Honors, and Prizes
Impacts
Search by expertise, name or affiliation
Temporal discontinuity trials and randomization: Success rates versus design strength
Brian Knaeble
,
Erich Kummerfeld
Institute for Health Informatics
Research output
:
Contribution to journal
›
Article
›
peer-review
Overview
Fingerprint
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Temporal discontinuity trials and randomization: Success rates versus design strength'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Sort by
Weight
Alphabetically
Keyphrases
Success Rate
100%
Strength Design
100%
Temporal Discontinuity
100%
Randomized Trial
66%
Second-line Treatment
66%
First Treatment
66%
Intervention Policies
66%
Discontinuity Design
66%
Heterogeneous Treatment Effects
33%
Treatment Decisions
33%
Crohn's Disease
33%
Nonrandomized Studies
33%
Design Parameters
33%
Medical Conditions
33%
Treatment Assignment
33%
Randomized Experiment
33%
High Failure Rate
33%
Novel Design
33%
Detail Design
33%
Wider Population
33%
Decision Policy
33%
Treatment Interventions
33%
Formal Conditions
33%
Mathematics
Randomized Trial
100%
Approximates
50%
Asymmetric
50%
Treatment Assignment
50%
Randomized Study
50%
Design Parameter
50%
Medical Condition
50%
Psychology
Temporal Discontinuity
100%
Study Design
33%