Abstract
Ecologists have been compiling ecological networks for over a century, detailing the interactions between species in a variety of ecosystems. To this end, they have built networks for mutualistic (e.g., pollination, seed dispersal) as well as antagonistic (e.g., herbivory, parasit-ism) interactions. The type of interaction being represented is believed to be reflected in the structure of the network, which would differ substantially between mutualistic and antagonistic networks. Here, we put this notion to the test by attempting to determine the type of interaction represented in a network based solely on its structure. We find that, although it is easy to separate different kinds of nonecological networks, ecological networks display much structural variation, making it difficult to distinguish between mutualistic and antagonistic interactions. We therefore frame the problem as a challenge for the community of scientists interested in computational biology and machine learning. We discuss the features a good solution to this problem should possess and the obstacles that need to be overcome to achieve this goal.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Article number | e1007076 |
| Journal | PLoS computational biology |
| Volume | 15 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jun 2019 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:MJM-S received funding from U.S. Department of Education (https://www.ed.gov/) grant P200A150101. SA and MJM-S received funding from the National Science Foundation (https://www.nsf.gov/) grant DEB-1148867 and the France Chicago Center?s "France And Chicago Collaborating in The Sciences" program (https:// fcc.uchicago.edu/faccts). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Michalska-Smith, Allesina.
Copyright:
Copyright 2019 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.