TY - JOUR
T1 - Teachers’ Use of Specific, Contingent, and Varied Praise
AU - Markelz, Andrew
AU - Riden, Benjamin
AU - Floress, Margaret T.
AU - Balint-Langel, Kinga
AU - Heath, Joshua
AU - Pavelka, Shelby
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Hammill Institute on Disabilities 2021.
PY - 2021/1/19
Y1 - 2021/1/19
N2 - Behavior-specific praise is a research-based classroom management strategy that promotes appropriate student behaviors. Praise specificity, however, may not be the only characteristic of praise that enhances efficacy. The current study examined teacher’s natural use of specific, contingent, and varied praise to understand additional qualities of praise. Praise statements of inservice special education (n = 12), inservice general education (n = 13), and dual special education/general education preservice (n = 17) teachers were observed in natural elementary school settings. Statistical results did not indicate differences between teacher groups and praise characteristics; however, descriptive results demonstrate all teacher groups delivered low rates of general and specific praise. Percentages of praise contingency (average range = 59%–91.2%) suggest teachers did not deliver sufficient praise statements contingent on student behavior. Furthermore, percentages of praise variety (average range = 44.5%–57.7%) show use of repetitive praise statements that may reduce efficacy on student behaviors. These findings and other implications are discussed in the context of future praise research.
AB - Behavior-specific praise is a research-based classroom management strategy that promotes appropriate student behaviors. Praise specificity, however, may not be the only characteristic of praise that enhances efficacy. The current study examined teacher’s natural use of specific, contingent, and varied praise to understand additional qualities of praise. Praise statements of inservice special education (n = 12), inservice general education (n = 13), and dual special education/general education preservice (n = 17) teachers were observed in natural elementary school settings. Statistical results did not indicate differences between teacher groups and praise characteristics; however, descriptive results demonstrate all teacher groups delivered low rates of general and specific praise. Percentages of praise contingency (average range = 59%–91.2%) suggest teachers did not deliver sufficient praise statements contingent on student behavior. Furthermore, percentages of praise variety (average range = 44.5%–57.7%) show use of repetitive praise statements that may reduce efficacy on student behaviors. These findings and other implications are discussed in the context of future praise research.
KW - general education
KW - natural rates
KW - special education
KW - teacher praise
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85099581019&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85099581019&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/1098300720988250
DO - 10.1177/1098300720988250
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85099581019
SN - 1098-3007
VL - 24
SP - 110
EP - 121
JO - Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions
JF - Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions
IS - 2
ER -