Systematic evaluation of factors influencing ChIP-seq fidelity

Yiwen Chen, Nicolas Negre, Qunhua Li, Joanna O. Mieczkowska, Matthew Slattery, Tao Liu, Yong Zhang, Tae Kyung Kim, Housheng Hansen He, Jennifer Zieba, Yijun Ruan, Peter J. Bickel, Richard M. Myers, Barbara J. Wold, Kevin P. White, Jason D. Lieb, X. Shirley Liu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

96 Scopus citations

Abstract

We evaluated how variations in sequencing depth and other parameters influence interpretation of chromatin immunoprecipitation-sequencing (ChIP-seq) experiments. Using Drosophila melanogaster S2 cells, we generated ChIP-seq data sets for a site-specific transcription factor (Suppressor of Hairy-wing) and a histone modification (H3K36me3). We detected a chromatin-state bias: open chromatin regions yielded higher coverage, which led to false positives if not corrected. This bias had a greater effect on detection specificity than any base-composition bias. Paired-end sequencing revealed that single-end data underestimated ChIP-library complexity at high coverage. Removal of reads originating at the same base reduced false-positives but had little effect on detection sensitivity. Even at mappable-genome coverage depth of ∼1 read per base pair, ∼1% of the narrow peaks detected on a tiling array were missed by ChIP-seq. Evaluation of widely used ChIP-seq analysis tools suggests that adjustments or algorithm improvements are required to handle data sets with deep coverage.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)609-614
Number of pages6
JournalNature Methods
Volume9
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2012

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
We thank the authors of all of the algorithms that we evaluated in this study: H. Ji, R. Jothi, P. Kharchenko, W. Li, D. Nix, J. Rozowsky and A. Valouev. We thank N. Bild, D. Roqueiro and M. Sabala for help in performing PeakSeq on the Bionimbus Cloud, D. Schmidt and D. Odom for sharing their sequencing data of the ENCODE spike-in sample, A. Kundaje for sharing his unpublished results on IDR analysis of H3K36me3 in humans, N. Rashid for sharing the mappability data of Drosophila genome, M. Greenberg for support in the early stage of this project, and E. Birney, M. Snyder, J. Ahringer, M. Gerstein, M. Kellis, P. Park and other members of modENCODE consortium for helpful discussions. This work was partially funded by US National Institutes of Health (HG4069 to X.S.L., 3U01 HG004270-03S1 to X.S.L. and J.D.L., and U01HG004264 to K.P.W.).

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Systematic evaluation of factors influencing ChIP-seq fidelity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this