Surgical Residency Recruitment—Opportunities for Improvement

Amit R.T. Joshi, Daniel Vargo, Amy Mathis, Jeffrey N. Love, Teena Dhir, Paula M. Termuhlen

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction The Association of Program Directors in Surgery convened a panel during Surgical Education Week 2016 to discuss the current state of the general surgery residency application process and to review alternative ways to evaluate the suitability of each applicant to a residency program. Methods/Results Over 40,000 applicants registered for the National Resident Matching Program's 2016 Main Residency Match. General Surgery had 2345 applicants for 1241 categorical postgraduate year (PGY)-1 positions, and 1239 of those positions were filled when the matching algorithm was processed. Program Directors reported that only 33% of applications received an in-depth review, and 62% were rejected with minimal review. Eventually (after all applications had been reviewed), only 13% of applicants were invited to interview. Conclusions There are several opportunities for improvement within the current application process. These included standardized letter of recommendation and personal statements, refinement of the interview process, and recalibration of the Medical Student Performance Evaluation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)e104-e110
JournalJournal of surgical education
Volume73
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2016

Fingerprint

Internship and Residency
applicant
surgery
Interviews
director
Medical Students
interview
Education
medical student
resident
evaluation
performance
education

Keywords

  • ERAS
  • Interpersonal and Communication Skills
  • MSPE
  • Professionalism
  • standardized letter of recommendation
  • surgery

Cite this

Surgical Residency Recruitment—Opportunities for Improvement. / Joshi, Amit R.T.; Vargo, Daniel; Mathis, Amy; Love, Jeffrey N.; Dhir, Teena; Termuhlen, Paula M.

In: Journal of surgical education, Vol. 73, No. 6, 01.11.2016, p. e104-e110.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Joshi, Amit R.T. ; Vargo, Daniel ; Mathis, Amy ; Love, Jeffrey N. ; Dhir, Teena ; Termuhlen, Paula M. / Surgical Residency Recruitment—Opportunities for Improvement. In: Journal of surgical education. 2016 ; Vol. 73, No. 6. pp. e104-e110.
@article{266aa575c7064c38a65e4e122ad111b7,
title = "Surgical Residency Recruitment—Opportunities for Improvement",
abstract = "Introduction The Association of Program Directors in Surgery convened a panel during Surgical Education Week 2016 to discuss the current state of the general surgery residency application process and to review alternative ways to evaluate the suitability of each applicant to a residency program. Methods/Results Over 40,000 applicants registered for the National Resident Matching Program's 2016 Main Residency Match. General Surgery had 2345 applicants for 1241 categorical postgraduate year (PGY)-1 positions, and 1239 of those positions were filled when the matching algorithm was processed. Program Directors reported that only 33{\%} of applications received an in-depth review, and 62{\%} were rejected with minimal review. Eventually (after all applications had been reviewed), only 13{\%} of applicants were invited to interview. Conclusions There are several opportunities for improvement within the current application process. These included standardized letter of recommendation and personal statements, refinement of the interview process, and recalibration of the Medical Student Performance Evaluation.",
keywords = "ERAS, Interpersonal and Communication Skills, MSPE, Professionalism, standardized letter of recommendation, surgery",
author = "Joshi, {Amit R.T.} and Daniel Vargo and Amy Mathis and Love, {Jeffrey N.} and Teena Dhir and Termuhlen, {Paula M.}",
year = "2016",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jsurg.2016.09.005",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "73",
pages = "e104--e110",
journal = "Journal of Surgical Education",
issn = "1931-7204",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Surgical Residency Recruitment—Opportunities for Improvement

AU - Joshi, Amit R.T.

AU - Vargo, Daniel

AU - Mathis, Amy

AU - Love, Jeffrey N.

AU - Dhir, Teena

AU - Termuhlen, Paula M.

PY - 2016/11/1

Y1 - 2016/11/1

N2 - Introduction The Association of Program Directors in Surgery convened a panel during Surgical Education Week 2016 to discuss the current state of the general surgery residency application process and to review alternative ways to evaluate the suitability of each applicant to a residency program. Methods/Results Over 40,000 applicants registered for the National Resident Matching Program's 2016 Main Residency Match. General Surgery had 2345 applicants for 1241 categorical postgraduate year (PGY)-1 positions, and 1239 of those positions were filled when the matching algorithm was processed. Program Directors reported that only 33% of applications received an in-depth review, and 62% were rejected with minimal review. Eventually (after all applications had been reviewed), only 13% of applicants were invited to interview. Conclusions There are several opportunities for improvement within the current application process. These included standardized letter of recommendation and personal statements, refinement of the interview process, and recalibration of the Medical Student Performance Evaluation.

AB - Introduction The Association of Program Directors in Surgery convened a panel during Surgical Education Week 2016 to discuss the current state of the general surgery residency application process and to review alternative ways to evaluate the suitability of each applicant to a residency program. Methods/Results Over 40,000 applicants registered for the National Resident Matching Program's 2016 Main Residency Match. General Surgery had 2345 applicants for 1241 categorical postgraduate year (PGY)-1 positions, and 1239 of those positions were filled when the matching algorithm was processed. Program Directors reported that only 33% of applications received an in-depth review, and 62% were rejected with minimal review. Eventually (after all applications had been reviewed), only 13% of applicants were invited to interview. Conclusions There are several opportunities for improvement within the current application process. These included standardized letter of recommendation and personal statements, refinement of the interview process, and recalibration of the Medical Student Performance Evaluation.

KW - ERAS

KW - Interpersonal and Communication Skills

KW - MSPE

KW - Professionalism

KW - standardized letter of recommendation

KW - surgery

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84997840890&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84997840890&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jsurg.2016.09.005

DO - 10.1016/j.jsurg.2016.09.005

M3 - Review article

C2 - 27886970

AN - SCOPUS:84997840890

VL - 73

SP - e104-e110

JO - Journal of Surgical Education

JF - Journal of Surgical Education

SN - 1931-7204

IS - 6

ER -