Skip to main navigation
Skip to search
Skip to main content
Experts@Minnesota Home
Search content at Experts@Minnesota
Home
Profiles
Research units
University Assets
Projects and Grants
Research output
Datasets
Press/Media
Activities
Fellowships, Honors, and Prizes
Impacts
Surgical approaches to anal incontinence.
W. D. Wong
, David A Rothenberger
Surgery
Research output
:
Contribution to journal
›
Review article
›
peer-review
6
Link opens in a new tab
Scopus citations
Overview
Fingerprint
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Surgical approaches to anal incontinence.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Sort by
Weight
Alphabetically
Keyphrases
Incontinence
100%
Surgical Approach
100%
Anal Incontinence
100%
Fecal Incontinence
66%
Continence
66%
Success Rate
66%
Trauma
33%
Therapeutic Potential
33%
Patient Selection
33%
Surgical Treatment
33%
Sigmoid Resection
33%
External Sphincter
33%
Abdominal Repair
33%
Gluteus Medius
33%
Anal Sphincter Injury
33%
Internal Anal Sphincter
33%
Anal Sphincter
33%
Primary Repair
33%
Silastic
33%
Surgeon Experience
33%
Surgeon Preference
33%
Suture Rectopexy
33%
Stomata
33%
Gracilis
33%
Dacron
33%
Secondary Reconstruction
33%
Muscle Transfer
33%
Anorectal Angle
33%
Rectal Procidentia
33%
AMS 800
33%
Sphincter Reconstruction
33%
Urinary Sphincter
33%
Underlying Etiologies
33%
Neurological Damage
33%
Anal Encirclement
33%
Medicine and Dentistry
Feces Incontinence
100%
Surgical Approach
100%
Sphincter
100%
Incontinence
75%
Internal Anal Sphincter
75%
Continence
50%
Surgeon
25%
Urinary System
25%
Sigmoidectomy
25%
Proctopexy
25%
Silastic
25%
Rectal Prolapse
25%
Gracilis
25%
Muscle Transplantation
25%
Polyethylene Terephthalate
25%
Suture
25%
Stoma
25%
Etiology
25%
Surgery
25%