TY - JOUR
T1 - Supporting Teachers’ Data-Based Individualization of Early Writing Instruction
T2 - An Efficacy Trial
AU - McMaster, Kristen L.
AU - Lembke, Erica S.
AU - Shanahan, Emma
AU - Choi, Seohyeon
AU - An, Jechun
AU - Schatschneider, Christopher
AU - Duesenberg-Marshall, McKinzie D.
AU - Birinci, Seyma
AU - McCollom, Elizabeth
AU - Garman, Carol
AU - Moore, Kim
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Hammill Institute on Disabilities 2024.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - In a multiyear, multisite, randomized control trial, we examined the effects of comprehensive professional development designed to support teachers’ data-based instruction (DBI) for students with intensive early writing needs. Teachers (N = 154; primarily special educators or intervention specialists) were assigned randomly to a treatment group (n = 76), in which they received tools, learning, and coaching to support their DBI implementation over 20 weeks, or to a control group (n = 78). Students either received DBI in early writing (n = 155) from treatment teachers or their usual writing instruction (n = 154) from control teachers. Treatment teachers outperformed controls on measures of DBI knowledge and skills (d = 1.57) and self-efficacy for writing instruction (d =.94), and treatment students outperformed controls on proximal and distal writing outcomes (ds =.14–.29). Student characteristics (grade, special education status, English learner status, and race/ethnicity) did not moderate intervention effects. We discuss findings in terms of the importance of supporting students with intensive learning needs, the efficacy and feasibility of implementing DBI-TLC, and implications for pre- and in-service teacher training and support.
AB - In a multiyear, multisite, randomized control trial, we examined the effects of comprehensive professional development designed to support teachers’ data-based instruction (DBI) for students with intensive early writing needs. Teachers (N = 154; primarily special educators or intervention specialists) were assigned randomly to a treatment group (n = 76), in which they received tools, learning, and coaching to support their DBI implementation over 20 weeks, or to a control group (n = 78). Students either received DBI in early writing (n = 155) from treatment teachers or their usual writing instruction (n = 154) from control teachers. Treatment teachers outperformed controls on measures of DBI knowledge and skills (d = 1.57) and self-efficacy for writing instruction (d =.94), and treatment students outperformed controls on proximal and distal writing outcomes (ds =.14–.29). Student characteristics (grade, special education status, English learner status, and race/ethnicity) did not moderate intervention effects. We discuss findings in terms of the importance of supporting students with intensive learning needs, the efficacy and feasibility of implementing DBI-TLC, and implications for pre- and in-service teacher training and support.
KW - curriculum-based measurement
KW - data-based instruction
KW - early intervention
KW - students with disabilities
KW - writing
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85211208440&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85211208440&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/00222194241300324
DO - 10.1177/00222194241300324
M3 - Article
C2 - 39648409
AN - SCOPUS:85211208440
SN - 0022-2194
JO - Journal of Learning Disabilities
JF - Journal of Learning Disabilities
ER -