Support for smoke-free policies: A nationwide analysis of immigrants, US-Born, and other demographic groups, 1995-2002

Theresa L. Osypuk, Dolores Acevedo-Garcla

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

30 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives:We examined whether support for tobacco control policies varies by demographic group, including nativity status (i.e., immigrant versus US born). Methods. We analyzed 1995 to 2002 data from the Current Population Survey Tobacco Use Supplement (n=543951). The outcome was a summary attitudinal measure assessing support of smoking bans in 4 of 6 venues. Results. US-born respondents, smokers, male respondents, Native Americans, Whites, and those who were unmarried, of lower socioeconomic status, and whose workplaces and homes were not smoke free were less likely to support smoking bans. Immigrants exhibited stronger support for banning smoking in every venue, with a generation-specific gradient in which support eroded with increasing assimilation to the United States. Levels of support were more than twice as high among immigrants as among US-born respondents (odds ratio [OR]=2.16; 95% confidence interval [Cl]= 2.08, 2.23). Naturalized citizens displayed higher support than US-born citizens, which may be relevant for mobilization of the electorate. Differences in population composition and contexts (e.g., smoke-free workplaces) only partially accounted for immigrants' stronger level of support. Conclusions. Immigrants and their children may be valuable tobacco control allies given their supportive attitudes toward smoke-free policies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)171-181
Number of pages11
JournalAmerican journal of public health
Volume100
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2010

Fingerprint

Smoke-Free Policy
Demography
Smoking
Smoke
Workplace
Tobacco
North American Indians
Tobacco Use
Social Class
Population
Odds Ratio
Confidence Intervals
Surveys and Questionnaires

Cite this

Support for smoke-free policies : A nationwide analysis of immigrants, US-Born, and other demographic groups, 1995-2002. / Osypuk, Theresa L.; Acevedo-Garcla, Dolores.

In: American journal of public health, Vol. 100, No. 1, 01.01.2010, p. 171-181.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9a81e3ad73484a4f8830f01249ae5f4b,
title = "Support for smoke-free policies: A nationwide analysis of immigrants, US-Born, and other demographic groups, 1995-2002",
abstract = "Objectives:We examined whether support for tobacco control policies varies by demographic group, including nativity status (i.e., immigrant versus US born). Methods. We analyzed 1995 to 2002 data from the Current Population Survey Tobacco Use Supplement (n=543951). The outcome was a summary attitudinal measure assessing support of smoking bans in 4 of 6 venues. Results. US-born respondents, smokers, male respondents, Native Americans, Whites, and those who were unmarried, of lower socioeconomic status, and whose workplaces and homes were not smoke free were less likely to support smoking bans. Immigrants exhibited stronger support for banning smoking in every venue, with a generation-specific gradient in which support eroded with increasing assimilation to the United States. Levels of support were more than twice as high among immigrants as among US-born respondents (odds ratio [OR]=2.16; 95{\%} confidence interval [Cl]= 2.08, 2.23). Naturalized citizens displayed higher support than US-born citizens, which may be relevant for mobilization of the electorate. Differences in population composition and contexts (e.g., smoke-free workplaces) only partially accounted for immigrants' stronger level of support. Conclusions. Immigrants and their children may be valuable tobacco control allies given their supportive attitudes toward smoke-free policies.",
author = "Osypuk, {Theresa L.} and Dolores Acevedo-Garcla",
year = "2010",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2105/AJPH.2009.160218",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "100",
pages = "171--181",
journal = "American Journal of Public Health",
issn = "0090-0036",
publisher = "American Public Health Association Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Support for smoke-free policies

T2 - A nationwide analysis of immigrants, US-Born, and other demographic groups, 1995-2002

AU - Osypuk, Theresa L.

AU - Acevedo-Garcla, Dolores

PY - 2010/1/1

Y1 - 2010/1/1

N2 - Objectives:We examined whether support for tobacco control policies varies by demographic group, including nativity status (i.e., immigrant versus US born). Methods. We analyzed 1995 to 2002 data from the Current Population Survey Tobacco Use Supplement (n=543951). The outcome was a summary attitudinal measure assessing support of smoking bans in 4 of 6 venues. Results. US-born respondents, smokers, male respondents, Native Americans, Whites, and those who were unmarried, of lower socioeconomic status, and whose workplaces and homes were not smoke free were less likely to support smoking bans. Immigrants exhibited stronger support for banning smoking in every venue, with a generation-specific gradient in which support eroded with increasing assimilation to the United States. Levels of support were more than twice as high among immigrants as among US-born respondents (odds ratio [OR]=2.16; 95% confidence interval [Cl]= 2.08, 2.23). Naturalized citizens displayed higher support than US-born citizens, which may be relevant for mobilization of the electorate. Differences in population composition and contexts (e.g., smoke-free workplaces) only partially accounted for immigrants' stronger level of support. Conclusions. Immigrants and their children may be valuable tobacco control allies given their supportive attitudes toward smoke-free policies.

AB - Objectives:We examined whether support for tobacco control policies varies by demographic group, including nativity status (i.e., immigrant versus US born). Methods. We analyzed 1995 to 2002 data from the Current Population Survey Tobacco Use Supplement (n=543951). The outcome was a summary attitudinal measure assessing support of smoking bans in 4 of 6 venues. Results. US-born respondents, smokers, male respondents, Native Americans, Whites, and those who were unmarried, of lower socioeconomic status, and whose workplaces and homes were not smoke free were less likely to support smoking bans. Immigrants exhibited stronger support for banning smoking in every venue, with a generation-specific gradient in which support eroded with increasing assimilation to the United States. Levels of support were more than twice as high among immigrants as among US-born respondents (odds ratio [OR]=2.16; 95% confidence interval [Cl]= 2.08, 2.23). Naturalized citizens displayed higher support than US-born citizens, which may be relevant for mobilization of the electorate. Differences in population composition and contexts (e.g., smoke-free workplaces) only partially accounted for immigrants' stronger level of support. Conclusions. Immigrants and their children may be valuable tobacco control allies given their supportive attitudes toward smoke-free policies.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=74049088727&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=74049088727&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2105/AJPH.2009.160218

DO - 10.2105/AJPH.2009.160218

M3 - Article

C2 - 19910345

AN - SCOPUS:74049088727

VL - 100

SP - 171

EP - 181

JO - American Journal of Public Health

JF - American Journal of Public Health

SN - 0090-0036

IS - 1

ER -