Summarizing US Wildlife Trade with an Eye Toward Assessing the Risk of Infectious Disease Introduction

K. M. Smith, C. Zambrana-Torrelio, A. White, M. Asmussen, C. Machalaba, S. Kennedy, K. Lopez, T. M. Wolf, P. Daszak, D. A. Travis, W. B. Karesh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The aim of this study was to characterize the role of the USA in the global exchange of wildlife and describe high volume trade with an eye toward prioritizing health risk assessment questions for further analysis. Here we summarize nearly 14 years (2000–2013) of the most comprehensive data available (USFWS LEMIS system), involving 11 billion individual specimens and an additional 977 million kilograms of wildlife. The majority of shipments contained mammals (27%), while the majority of specimens imported were shells (57%) and tropical fish (25%). Most imports were facilitated by the aquatic and pet industry, resulting in one-third of all shipments containing live animals. The importer reported origin of wildlife was 77.7% wild-caught and 17.7% captive-reared. Indonesia was the leading exporter of legal shipments, while Mexico was the leading source reported for illegal shipments. At the specimen level, China was the leading exporter of legal and illegal wildlife imports. The number of annual declared shipments doubled during the period examined, illustrating continually increasing demand, which reinforces the need to scale up capacity for border inspections, risk management protocols and disease surveillance. Most regulatory oversight of wildlife trade is aimed at conservation, rather than prevention of disease introduction.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)29-39
Number of pages11
JournalEcoHealth
Volume14
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2017

Fingerprint

infectious disease
Communicable Diseases
Indonesia
Pets
Risk Management
Mexico
Mammals
China
Industry
Fishes
import
Health
health risk
risk assessment
mammal
wildlife
shell
animal
industry
fish

Keywords

  • disease
  • illegal trade
  • legal trade
  • species
  • wildlife trade

Cite this

Smith, K. M., Zambrana-Torrelio, C., White, A., Asmussen, M., Machalaba, C., Kennedy, S., ... Karesh, W. B. (2017). Summarizing US Wildlife Trade with an Eye Toward Assessing the Risk of Infectious Disease Introduction. EcoHealth, 14(1), 29-39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10393-017-1211-7

Summarizing US Wildlife Trade with an Eye Toward Assessing the Risk of Infectious Disease Introduction. / Smith, K. M.; Zambrana-Torrelio, C.; White, A.; Asmussen, M.; Machalaba, C.; Kennedy, S.; Lopez, K.; Wolf, T. M.; Daszak, P.; Travis, D. A.; Karesh, W. B.

In: EcoHealth, Vol. 14, No. 1, 01.03.2017, p. 29-39.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Smith, KM, Zambrana-Torrelio, C, White, A, Asmussen, M, Machalaba, C, Kennedy, S, Lopez, K, Wolf, TM, Daszak, P, Travis, DA & Karesh, WB 2017, 'Summarizing US Wildlife Trade with an Eye Toward Assessing the Risk of Infectious Disease Introduction' EcoHealth, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 29-39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10393-017-1211-7
Smith KM, Zambrana-Torrelio C, White A, Asmussen M, Machalaba C, Kennedy S et al. Summarizing US Wildlife Trade with an Eye Toward Assessing the Risk of Infectious Disease Introduction. EcoHealth. 2017 Mar 1;14(1):29-39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10393-017-1211-7
Smith, K. M. ; Zambrana-Torrelio, C. ; White, A. ; Asmussen, M. ; Machalaba, C. ; Kennedy, S. ; Lopez, K. ; Wolf, T. M. ; Daszak, P. ; Travis, D. A. ; Karesh, W. B. / Summarizing US Wildlife Trade with an Eye Toward Assessing the Risk of Infectious Disease Introduction. In: EcoHealth. 2017 ; Vol. 14, No. 1. pp. 29-39.
@article{9633455cf93e46e080d32c16863e5494,
title = "Summarizing US Wildlife Trade with an Eye Toward Assessing the Risk of Infectious Disease Introduction",
abstract = "The aim of this study was to characterize the role of the USA in the global exchange of wildlife and describe high volume trade with an eye toward prioritizing health risk assessment questions for further analysis. Here we summarize nearly 14 years (2000–2013) of the most comprehensive data available (USFWS LEMIS system), involving 11 billion individual specimens and an additional 977 million kilograms of wildlife. The majority of shipments contained mammals (27{\%}), while the majority of specimens imported were shells (57{\%}) and tropical fish (25{\%}). Most imports were facilitated by the aquatic and pet industry, resulting in one-third of all shipments containing live animals. The importer reported origin of wildlife was 77.7{\%} wild-caught and 17.7{\%} captive-reared. Indonesia was the leading exporter of legal shipments, while Mexico was the leading source reported for illegal shipments. At the specimen level, China was the leading exporter of legal and illegal wildlife imports. The number of annual declared shipments doubled during the period examined, illustrating continually increasing demand, which reinforces the need to scale up capacity for border inspections, risk management protocols and disease surveillance. Most regulatory oversight of wildlife trade is aimed at conservation, rather than prevention of disease introduction.",
keywords = "disease, illegal trade, legal trade, species, wildlife trade",
author = "Smith, {K. M.} and C. Zambrana-Torrelio and A. White and M. Asmussen and C. Machalaba and S. Kennedy and K. Lopez and Wolf, {T. M.} and P. Daszak and Travis, {D. A.} and Karesh, {W. B.}",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10393-017-1211-7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "29--39",
journal = "EcoHealth",
issn = "1612-9202",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Summarizing US Wildlife Trade with an Eye Toward Assessing the Risk of Infectious Disease Introduction

AU - Smith, K. M.

AU - Zambrana-Torrelio, C.

AU - White, A.

AU - Asmussen, M.

AU - Machalaba, C.

AU - Kennedy, S.

AU - Lopez, K.

AU - Wolf, T. M.

AU - Daszak, P.

AU - Travis, D. A.

AU - Karesh, W. B.

PY - 2017/3/1

Y1 - 2017/3/1

N2 - The aim of this study was to characterize the role of the USA in the global exchange of wildlife and describe high volume trade with an eye toward prioritizing health risk assessment questions for further analysis. Here we summarize nearly 14 years (2000–2013) of the most comprehensive data available (USFWS LEMIS system), involving 11 billion individual specimens and an additional 977 million kilograms of wildlife. The majority of shipments contained mammals (27%), while the majority of specimens imported were shells (57%) and tropical fish (25%). Most imports were facilitated by the aquatic and pet industry, resulting in one-third of all shipments containing live animals. The importer reported origin of wildlife was 77.7% wild-caught and 17.7% captive-reared. Indonesia was the leading exporter of legal shipments, while Mexico was the leading source reported for illegal shipments. At the specimen level, China was the leading exporter of legal and illegal wildlife imports. The number of annual declared shipments doubled during the period examined, illustrating continually increasing demand, which reinforces the need to scale up capacity for border inspections, risk management protocols and disease surveillance. Most regulatory oversight of wildlife trade is aimed at conservation, rather than prevention of disease introduction.

AB - The aim of this study was to characterize the role of the USA in the global exchange of wildlife and describe high volume trade with an eye toward prioritizing health risk assessment questions for further analysis. Here we summarize nearly 14 years (2000–2013) of the most comprehensive data available (USFWS LEMIS system), involving 11 billion individual specimens and an additional 977 million kilograms of wildlife. The majority of shipments contained mammals (27%), while the majority of specimens imported were shells (57%) and tropical fish (25%). Most imports were facilitated by the aquatic and pet industry, resulting in one-third of all shipments containing live animals. The importer reported origin of wildlife was 77.7% wild-caught and 17.7% captive-reared. Indonesia was the leading exporter of legal shipments, while Mexico was the leading source reported for illegal shipments. At the specimen level, China was the leading exporter of legal and illegal wildlife imports. The number of annual declared shipments doubled during the period examined, illustrating continually increasing demand, which reinforces the need to scale up capacity for border inspections, risk management protocols and disease surveillance. Most regulatory oversight of wildlife trade is aimed at conservation, rather than prevention of disease introduction.

KW - disease

KW - illegal trade

KW - legal trade

KW - species

KW - wildlife trade

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85011901191&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85011901191&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10393-017-1211-7

DO - 10.1007/s10393-017-1211-7

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 29

EP - 39

JO - EcoHealth

JF - EcoHealth

SN - 1612-9202

IS - 1

ER -