Purpose: We have measured collimator and phantom scatter factors (Sc, Sp) as a function of field size for a variety of moving slit widths and compared them with static field factors. Dynamic treatment plans were devised to compare the ability of two planning systems to model the aperture effect on dose delivery, especially for small targets. Method and Materials: An 80 leaf Varian 2300cd and a 120 leaf Varian 21ex accelerator were used with 6 MV photons. 0.6 cm3 ionization chambers were used, for both Sc and Scp measurements. 1–10mm leaf gaps were dynamically scanned across a range of field sizes (4×4–14×40). To mimic the small aperture effect in a treatment plan, we defined a series of cylindrical targets, 1–20 mm diameter by 3cm length and an IMRT plan using Eclipse or Pinnacle3 was developed to optimally treat them. EDR2 films were taken and used to compare delivered with planned doses. Results: The dynamic measurements of Sc and Scp were very similar on the two Varian machines and clearly demonstrated an aperture effect in the Sc measurements of as much as 30% (1mm gap, 4×4 field) which smoothly converged to the static field distribution as the gap was increased. Derived Sp values were approximately independent of gap width, essentially matching the static field cases. Planning system intercomparison of small target doses seem to indicate the Pinnacle3 system to be slightly better at correctly including aperture effect. Conclusions: Conventionally obtained output factors, using the secondary collimators, even extended down to 1–2 cm2 still do not describe the same head scatter contribution as is delivered by a dynamic aperture. Consequently, dose uncertainty may be amplified in the treatment of single or multiple small lesions using IMRT techniques.